Silicon Bring-up · All levels

Failure Isolation Flow: Reports and Metrics

Reports and Metrics for Failure Isolation Flow.

Reports and metrics

Reports and Metrics for Failure Isolation Flow is anchored on Time-to-isolation from first red test to first reproducible minimal failing experiment.. Convert observed behavior into mechanism-backed and owner-bound actions.

A useful report explains why behavior moved, not only that behavior moved.

Evidence matrix

diagram
EVIDENCE MATRIX - Failure Isolation Flow

+-------------------------------+--------------------------------+--------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| Evidence                      | Tells you                      | Does not prove                 | Next action                 |
+-------------------------------+--------------------------------+--------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| rail/current timeline         | sequencing and power health    | firmware or protocol integrity | align with stage logs       |
| stage checkpoint logs         | failing transition boundary    | electrical root cause          | correlate with scope traces |
| interface trace/decode        | protocol behavior and timing   | global platform readiness      | replay under fixed setup    |
| shmoo/corner matrix           | margin-sensitive fail region   | exact failing mechanism        | isolate with targeted tests |
| before/after replay packet    | mitigation movement quality    | long-run stability             | run soak and corner matrix  |
+-------------------------------+--------------------------------+--------------------------------+-----------------------------+
  • Track Time-to-isolation from first red test to first reproducible minimal failing experiment. on representative board and corner slices.

  • Include board/firmware/corner metadata in every report header.

  • Correlate electrical, software, and protocol evidence in one timeline.

  • Call out contradictory evidence explicitly.

Silicon bring-up deep dive

Triage quality is measured by how quickly teams converge from symptom to proven root-cause class with minimal collateral churn.

Concept diagram

diagram
TRIAGE CONVERGENCE

symptom -> classify -> isolate -> prove -> bounded fix -> replay

Metric graph

diagram
TRIAGE EFFECTIVENESS

wide speculative edits   ██████
classified bounded fixes █████████

Metrics and artifacts to collect

  • time-to-classification

  • first-failure artifact completeness

  • hypothesis branch conversion rate

  • post-fix recurrence trend

Mini case study

Intermittent field-like failures closed faster once teams forced one-variable branch tests and owner-tagged evidence packets.

Debug branches

  • Preserve first-failure state before reruns.

  • Use disproof-oriented experiments to collapse cause tree quickly.

  • Promote fixes only after recurrence tracking windows pass.

Senior review question

Ask: what is the first failing boundary, which artifact proves it, and who owns bounded closure?

Key takeaways

  • Tie every bring-up claim to one reproducible setup state and one proving artifact.

  • Prefer bounded fixes with clear owner and rollback trigger over broad multi-variable edits.

Common pitfalls

  • Running parallel uncontrolled experiments and losing causality.

  • Declaring closure without replaying across representative corners.

  • Escalating severity before bench/setup hypotheses are disproven.

Report interpretation

Interpret movement only when setup metadata is matched.

A useful report isolates first-failure stage and disqualifies alternate causes.