CPU Design · All levels

Predictor Types and Accuracy: Review Checklist

Review Checklist for Predictor Types and Accuracy.

Review checklist

Review Checklist for Predictor Types and Accuracy centers on global prediction accuracy, MPKI, and confidence calibration error. Tie every claim to a measurable artifact and an owner-controlled action.

  • Workload scope and KPI targets are explicit.

  • Environment metadata is locked and reproducible.

  • Stage-loss classification is backed by evidence.

  • Owner and rollback conditions are documented.

  • Validation matrix covers perf, correctness, and power.

  • Owners signed: branch predictor architect, predictor RTL owner, perf modeling lead.

CPU deep dive

Speculation helps only when wrong-path cost and recovery bandwidth are tightly controlled.

Concept diagram

diagram
SPECULATION LOOP

predict direction/target -> speculative fetch/decode -> resolve -> flush/recover

Metric graph

diagram
SPECULATION COST MIX

wrong-path decode work  █████
flush recovery delay    ████
refill starvation       ███

Reports and artifacts

  • branch accuracy by workload

  • BTB/RAS pressure report

  • mispredict recovery timeline

  • bad-speculation CPI share

Mini case study

Indirect branch aliasing in one service raised wrong-path work enough to dominate total CPI despite high ALU utilization.

Debug branches

  • Break down mispredicts by branch family and code region

  • Measure flush depth and refill bandwidth separately

  • Validate predictor changes under security mitigation settings

Senior review question

Ask: which CPI/latency evidence proves this topic is truly closed beyond synthetic benchmarks?

Key takeaways

  • Always connect microarchitectural counter changes to product workload outcomes.

  • Lock binary, compiler, firmware, and thermal metadata before comparing CPU traces.

Common pitfalls

  • Treating average IPC as sufficient proof while ignoring latency tails and outliers.

  • Applying predictor or prefetch tweaks without first-failing-stage attribution.

  • Declaring closure without reproducible perf, correctness, and power gates.

Review checklist explanation

A checklist here prevents false confidence. Every item should defend against a known closure failure mode.

For Predictor Types and Accuracy, minimum checklist: workload scope, global prediction accuracy, MPKI, and confidence calibration error, artifact evidence (predictor-type comparison matrix, accuracy-by-workload plot, and confidence histogram), bottleneck class, owner, rollback path, and full-matrix validation.

If architecture or RTL changed, include correctness, power, timing, and observability checks. If software policy changed, include compatibility and deployment safety evidence.