CPU Design · All levels

Clock/Power Domains (CPU): Review Checklist

Review Checklist for Clock/Power Domains (CPU).

Review checklist

Review Checklist for Clock/Power Domains (CPU) centers on clock skew budget usage, CDC/RDC violation count, and power-state transition stability. Tie every claim to a measurable artifact and an owner-controlled action.

  • Workload scope and KPI targets are explicit.

  • Environment metadata is locked and reproducible.

  • Stage-loss classification is backed by evidence.

  • Owner and rollback conditions are documented.

  • Validation matrix covers perf, correctness, and power.

  • Owners signed: clock architect, low-power architect, SoC integration lead.

CPU deep dive

Physical closure and observability planning determine whether CPU architecture wins survive first silicon.

Concept diagram

diagram
CPU SILICON CLOSURE

core/LLC floorplan -> clock/power domains -> PMCs/observability -> bring-up

Metric graph

diagram
CLOSURE RISK MIX

timing margin risk   █████
thermal hotspots     ████
bring-up blockers    ███

Reports and artifacts

  • floorplan congestion map

  • timing closure summary

  • IR/thermal transient report

  • bring-up milestone tracker

Mini case study

A floorplan change improved routing congestion but created thermal clustering that forced frequency throttling in sustained tests.

Debug branches

  • Trace critical paths to physical regions and domain crossings

  • Run dynamic IR and thermal checks on burst workloads

  • Use PMCs and bring-up logs to correlate silicon symptoms to design intent

Senior review question

Ask: which CPI/latency evidence proves this topic is truly closed beyond synthetic benchmarks?

Key takeaways

  • Always connect microarchitectural counter changes to product workload outcomes.

  • Lock binary, compiler, firmware, and thermal metadata before comparing CPU traces.

Common pitfalls

  • Treating average IPC as sufficient proof while ignoring latency tails and outliers.

  • Applying predictor or prefetch tweaks without first-failing-stage attribution.

  • Declaring closure without reproducible perf, correctness, and power gates.

Review checklist explanation

A checklist here prevents false confidence. Every item should defend against a known closure failure mode.

For Clock/Power Domains (CPU), minimum checklist: workload scope, clock skew budget usage, CDC/RDC violation count, and power-state transition stability, artifact evidence (clock tree partition map, UPF/CPF intent review, and CDC-RDC signoff report), bottleneck class, owner, rollback path, and full-matrix validation.

If architecture or RTL changed, include correctness, power, timing, and observability checks. If software policy changed, include compatibility and deployment safety evidence.