An RTL engineer wants a lint excerpt, a DV engineer wants a failure summary, and an STA or PD engineer wants the report behind a claim. This section explains how an assistant can obtain bounded evidence through MCP and apply a reusable review procedure through a skill. You need no server setup or model account to complete the paper exercises.
Lesson | Practical outcome |
|---|---|
Separate a connection protocol from an agent, retrieval strategy, and security boundary. | |
Inspect tools, resources, prompts, transport, and authorization. | |
Follow a complete synthetic report-search message trace. | |
Reject a report's attempt to redirect the task or expand access. | |
Specify a review procedure with inputs, references, and acceptance checks. | |
Design a narrow report-summary tool and review its behavior without executing it. |
All report identifiers, snapshot revisions, fictional implementation versions, excerpts, responses, and worked answers below are synthetic. The cited protocol revision is real. No model calls, server connections, simulations, or engineering tools were run to produce these examples. They demonstrate mechanics and evidence handling, not model quality or chip signoff.
No. Read the contracts, follow the messages, and check the worked answers by hand. The final lesson is a design specification rather than runnable server code.