Skip to content
DenseChip
Learn
PracticeCode labInterview

DenseChip

Navigate

Menu

LearnPracticeCode labInterview

Tools

All toolsSV editorCode repoResume
DenseChip

Practice, courses, and chip-design tools in one focused workspace.

LearnPracticeCode labInterviewToolsLearning paths

© 2026 DenseChip

AboutRoadmapCareersInternshipsFAQContactPrivacyTerms
Skip to lesson

Course contents

  • How to Use This Course
  • Reading Paths
  • Glossary
  • Metrics Reference
  • Formal Cheat Sheet
  • Formal Foundations19
  • Properties and SVA16
  • Property Development and Constraints19
  • Proof Engines and Convergence23
  • Formal Applications20
  • Equivalence Checking14
  • Formal Coverage and Signoff15
  • Methodology and Debug13
  • Interview Prep15
    • Formal Whiteboard Framework
    • Scenario: A Proof That Will Not Converge
    • Scenario: Everything Proves, Nothing Is Reached
    • Scenario: A Late ECO Breaks Equivalence
    • Scenario: A Deadlock-Like Trace in Arbiter and Fabric
    • Rapid Fire by Theme
    • Numeric Drills
    • Spot the Bug in the Answer
      • Spot the Bug in the Property Answers
      • Spot the Bug in the Proof Claims
  • Capstone: A Chip-Block Verification Lab24
Loading lesson

←Interview Prep
  1. Topics
  2. Formal Verification
  3. Interview Prep
  4. Spot the Bug in the Answer

Part 9 of 10Part 9 of 10/Interview PrepAll levels

Spot the Bug in the Answer

Practise defect-first review on twelve flawed answers, six properties and six claims, each with its repair.

  • 2topics
  • 2lessons

Strong panels hand the candidate a wrong answer and ask what breaks. These two drills rehearse exactly that: six flawed properties and six flawed claims, each shown as written, then dissected. Read the flawed version first, name the defect aloud before reading on, and check whether your correction matches: defect, effect, and the runnable repair where one exists.

Lesson

After it you can...

Spot the Bug in the Property Answers

Find the defect in six flawed properties and write the runnable correction.

Spot the Bug in the Proof Claims

Correct six false claims about results, induction, cones, liveness, convergence, and equivalence.

Suggested order: properties first, then claims. The property drill fixes notation and operator reading; the claims drill fixes result vocabulary. Both assume the whiteboard framework and link back to the lessons that prove each correction.

Read the flawed answer, name the defect aloud, state the effect it has on the result, then check the runnable repair.
How to work a spot-the-bug drill: defect, effect, repair.
Check yourself Why name the defect before reading on?

Because panels grade the diagnosis, not the rewrite: a candidate who says assignment-instead-of-comparison before touching the code has already earned the mechanism marks.

Related topics

  • Framework: Scoring Rubric and Structure

  • SystemVerilog: Operator Interview Drills

PreviousNext: Spot the Bug in the Property Answers

Up next

Up nextSpot the Bug in the Property Answers

Sign in to save progress

Practice this lessonPrevious lessonReport an error

See also

  • Formal Whiteboard Framework
  • Scenario: A Proof That Will Not Converge
  • Scenario: Everything Proves, Nothing Is Reached