SoC Integration · All levels

Top-Level Closure Dashboard: Inputs & Outputs

Inputs & Outputs for Top-Level Closure Dashboard.

Inputs and outputs contract

Inputs & Outputs for Top-Level Closure Dashboard focuses on open critical signoff items, closure burn-down trend. The goal is to map symptoms to boundary contracts, owner actions, and regression-proof closure.

Treat these as a signed integration contract. Ambiguity here causes multi-team debug loops where everyone is right inside their own assumptions.

diagram

INPUTS
  - baseline manifest (versions + hashes)
  - interface/budget contract revision
  - mode assumptions (functional/test/low-power)
  - owner accountability map

OUTPUTS
  - measurable closure deltas
  - owner-approved fix proposal
  - regression evidence package
  - risk/waiver disposition

Integration sequence

diagram

SOC INTEGRATION FLOW — Top-Level Closure Dashboard

requirements + budgets
        |
        v
IP handoff + collateral check
        |
        v
integration build + bring-up smoke
        |
        v
cross-domain signoff evidence
        |
        v
tapeout readiness decision

Metric in focus: open critical signoff items, closure burn-down trend

Ownership map

diagram

OWNERSHIP MAP — Top-Level Closure Dashboard

artifact             owner
-----------------    -----------------
primary owner     signoff lead
co-owner          program lead
review owner      domain owners

No top-level issue should remain ownerless beyond one review cycle.

SoC deep dive

Signoff confidence depends on evidence quality and reproducibility discipline.

Concept diagram

diagram

SIGNOFF DECISION FLOW
metrics -> manifest -> waivers -> executive review

Metric graph

diagram

OPEN CRITICALS OVER TIME
week1 █████████
week2 █████
week3 ██

Reports and artifacts

closure dashboard
signoff manifest
waiver aging report
TRR checklist

Mini case study

A near-tapeout risk was caught when manifest mismatch invalidated an apparently green closure report.

Debug branches

Validate manifest integrity
Bound waiver risk
Audit cross-domain owner approvals

Senior review question

Ask: what baseline, owner, and artifact prove this topic is truly closed?

Key takeaways

State baseline manifest and owner with every closure metric.
Run cross-domain regression after every top-level fix.

Common pitfalls

Comparing results across different manifests.
Unowned issues slipping through review cycles.
Waiving risks without expiry and validation plan.

Principal SoC review addendum

A closure dashboard unifies timing, power, DRC/LVS, CDC/RDC, and verification readiness into a decision-grade tapeout view.

Metric: open critical signoff items, closure burn-down trend

Practice this lesson