Abutment Rules: Review Checklist

Review checklist

Review Checklist for Abutment Rules focuses on abutment DRC count, manual exception count, integration turnaround. The goal is to connect observed symptom to boundary mechanism, ownership, and signoff risk.

• Boundary assumptions are versioned and signed.

• Mode matrix (power/clock/reset/stress) is explicit.

• Physical context (floorplan/package/power) is included where relevant.

• Metric and artifact references are reproducible.

• Waivers have owner, expiry, and mitigation.

• Owners signed: integration owner, PD owner, foundry interface owner.

Sign-off ownership

OWNERSHIP MAP — Abutment Rules

artifact                  owner
----------------------    -----------------------------
integration artifact    integration owner
implementation artifact PD owner
signoff artifact        foundry interface owner

Every boundary issue needs a named owner before fixes start.

AMS deep dive

Physical proximity and boundary rules are functional constraints in AMS SoCs.

Concept diagram

INTEGRATION FLOW

floorplan keepouts -> guard strategy -> abutment policy -> PV signoff

Metric graph

INTEGRATION ESCAPES

layout boundary issues ███████
waiver drift           ████

Reports and artifacts

• keepout violations

• guard-ring checks

• abutment DRC

• mixed-signal PV dashboard

Mini case study

Late macro move violated quiet-zone assumptions and caused intermittent converter noise excursions.

Debug branches

• Review macro adjacency

• Re-check guard assumptions

• Re-run PV with correct deck variant

Senior review question

Ask: what boundary condition proves this topic is actually closed?

Key takeaways

• State boundary, mode, and evidence tag with every claim.

• Always align analog, digital, and physical owners before signoff decisions.

Common pitfalls

• Fixing averages while tails still fail.

• Skipping package/supply evidence in jitter or SerDes issues.

• Shipping with waivers that lack owner and expiration criteria.

Principal AMS review addendum

Macro abutment rules encode legal proximity and orientation constraints; violation causes reliability or functional escapes at block boundaries.

Metric: abutment DRC count, manual exception count, integration turnaround