CDC / RDC · All levels
RDC Signoff Dashboard: Expanded Case Study
Expanded Case Study for RDC Signoff Dashboard.
Extended case study
Milestone review flags RDC critical trend, waiver aging, milestone readiness around RDC Signoff Dashboard.
Background
Team believed crossings were stable until stress mode exposed intermittent anomalies.
Symptoms observed
RDC critical trend, waiver aging, milestone readiness regression
Mismatch between structural report and dynamic behavior
Waiver debate under schedule pressure
Investigation timeline
Freeze design, reset, and tool configuration tags.
Reproduce failing scenario with minimized stimulus.
Map path/protocol/reset dependencies.
Classify root cause and containment options.
Execute minimal safe fix.
Run stress regression and review board.
Root cause
Root cause links to RDC Signoff Dashboard: An RDC dashboard tracks readiness across blocks and milestones, preventing unresolved reset risks from being hidden by aggregate pass rates.
Fix and validation
Targeted RTL/protocol/reset correction
Evidence refresh
Signoff board decision
Lessons learned
Treat waivers as temporary risk contracts
Track owner and expiry
Regression before closure
CASE STUDY — RDC Signoff Dashboard
critical issues before / after / signoffCrossing sequence under stress
CROSSING FLOW — RDC Signoff Dashboard
source clock domain -> launch signal -> crossing structure -> destination sample
| | | |
source FF protocol sync / fifo destination FF
Key metric: RDC critical trend, waiver aging, milestone readinessCDC/RDC deep dive
RDC closure must connect IP assumptions to SoC reality.
Concept diagram
RDC CLOSURE
IP reset intent + SoC sequencing -> structural checks -> dynamic stress -> signoffMetric graph
MILESTONE READINESS
M-2 55%
M-1 82%
M0 100%Reports and artifacts
top-level RDC opens
reset simulation coverage
chip integration blockers
waiver backlog
Mini case study
Each IP was locally clean, but top-level sequencing violation created cross-subsystem boot intermittency.
Debug branches
Audit subsystem assumptions
stress chip-level reset scenarios
close ownership gaps
Senior review question
Ask: what evidence proves this risk is closed for silicon, not just tool-clean?
Key takeaways
State crossing class, assumptions, and owner with every issue.
Run structural and dynamic regressions after each fix.
Common pitfalls
Treating all warnings as equivalent risk.
Waiving issues without containment evidence.
Skipping reset and reconvergence stress after CDC fixes.
Principal CDC/RDC review addendum
An RDC dashboard tracks readiness across blocks and milestones, preventing unresolved reset risks from being hidden by aggregate pass rates.
Metric: RDC critical trend, waiver aging, milestone readiness