Review Checklist for Interrupt Topology Contracts focuses on interrupt latency tail, missed-interrupt incidents. The goal is to map symptoms to boundary contracts, owner actions, and regression-proof closure.
Baseline manifest and revision are explicit.
Boundary contracts for this topic are current and approved.
Ownership map covers all open issues.
Focused and full regression evidence both exist.
Residual risks are either closed or bounded via waiver policy.
Owners signed: firmware owner, platform architect, RTL owner.
OWNERSHIP MAP — Interrupt Topology Contracts
artifact owner
----------------- -----------------
primary owner firmware owner
co-owner platform architect
review owner RTL owner
No top-level issue should remain ownerless beyond one review cycle.Address, interrupt, and IO contracts are where hardware/software alignment is won or lost.
HW/SW CONTRACT
address map + interrupt model + io defaults -> firmware behaviorBOOT REGRESSION SOURCES
map churn █████
reset defaults ████
driver mismatch ███address decode audit
interrupt latency report
IO bring-up checklist
boot contract review
A map alias issue caused sporadic peripheral misconfiguration despite clean block-level tests.
Freeze address map baseline
Audit reset defaults
Validate firmware assumptions
Ask: what baseline, owner, and artifact prove this topic is truly closed?
State baseline manifest and owner with every closure metric.
Run cross-domain regression after every top-level fix.
Comparing results across different manifests.
Unowned issues slipping through review cycles.
Waiving risks without expiry and validation plan.
Interrupt architecture defines aggregation, priority, routing, and affinity policies that software relies on for deterministic response.
Metric: interrupt latency tail, missed-interrupt incidents
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown