Synthesis & Logic Optimization · All levels

Dynamic Power Optimization in Synthesis: Review Checklist

Review Checklist for Dynamic Power Optimization in Synthesis.

Review checklist

Review Checklist for Dynamic Power Optimization in Synthesis focuses on switching power delta, clock power share, gating enable efficiency. The goal is to connect observed QoR movement to mechanism, ownership, and regression risk.

  • Run manifest is attached (RTL/SDC/libs/switches).

  • Primary metric and impacted lane are named.

  • Mechanism hypothesis is evidence-backed.

  • Fix is reversible and owner-assigned.

  • Regression matrix includes timing, area, power, and equivalence as needed.

  • Owners signed: power owner, synthesis owner, verification owner.

Sign-off ownership

diagram
OWNERSHIP MAP — Dynamic Power Optimization in Synthesis

artifact              owner
----------------      -----------------
compile owner       power owner
timing/power owner  synthesis owner
cross-team review   verification owner

Every QoR movement needs a named owner before ECO.

Synthesis deep dive

PPA closure is a constrained tradeoff problem, not a timing-only exercise.

Concept diagram

diagram
PPA TRIAD

timing target <-> power budget <-> area cap

Metric graph

diagram
PARETO PROGRESSION

early runs      o o
balanced point    o
over-tuned          o (risk)

Reports and artifacts

  • VT mix

  • leakage trend

  • dynamic power trend

  • PPA Pareto table

Mini case study

LVT-heavy fix recovered setup but violated leakage target; balanced VT strategy closed both.

Debug branches

  • Timing-only claims need power check

  • Validate hold on VT swaps

  • Use Pareto memo

Senior review question

Ask: what evidence proves this QoR move is real and stable?

Key takeaways

  • State exact run context (RTL, SDC, libs, switches) with every QoR claim.

  • Re-run timing, area, and power regressions after each synthesis ECO.

Common pitfalls

  • Comparing runs with mismatched constraints or library views.

  • Timing-only fixes that violate power or area budgets.

  • Skipping equivalence checks after structural changes.

Principal synthesis review addendum

Dynamic power reduction uses gating, restructuring, and activity-aware optimization; poor constraints can hide functional risk.

Metric: switching power delta, clock power share, gating enable efficiency