Synthesis & Logic Optimization · All levels
PPA Tradeoff Playbook: Reports & Metrics
Reports & Metrics for PPA Tradeoff Playbook.
Reports and metrics
Reports & Metrics for PPA Tradeoff Playbook focuses on area-power-timing Pareto points, closure runtime, regression stability. The goal is to connect observed QoR movement to mechanism, ownership, and regression risk.
A report is useful only when it supports decisions. For PPA Tradeoff Playbook, read metric movement with baseline context and expected budget.
Metric movement
QOR TREND — PPA Tradeoff Playbook
metric quality
^
| target band
| o o o
| o
| o regression
+----------------------------------> synthesis iteration
baseline tuning signoff-ready
Track: area-power-timing Pareto points, closure runtime, regression stabilityTrack area-power-timing Pareto points, closure runtime, regression stability with exact run manifests.
Keep timing/area/power side-by-side in review dashboards.
Require one-sentence mechanism hypothesis for every major delta.
Store before/after artifacts with owner signoff.
Synthesis deep dive
PPA closure is a constrained tradeoff problem, not a timing-only exercise.
Concept diagram
PPA TRIAD
timing target <-> power budget <-> area capMetric graph
PARETO PROGRESSION
early runs o o
balanced point o
over-tuned o (risk)Reports and artifacts
VT mix
leakage trend
dynamic power trend
PPA Pareto table
Mini case study
LVT-heavy fix recovered setup but violated leakage target; balanced VT strategy closed both.
Debug branches
Timing-only claims need power check
Validate hold on VT swaps
Use Pareto memo
Senior review question
Ask: what evidence proves this QoR move is real and stable?
Key takeaways
State exact run context (RTL, SDC, libs, switches) with every QoR claim.
Re-run timing, area, and power regressions after each synthesis ECO.
Common pitfalls
Comparing runs with mismatched constraints or library views.
Timing-only fixes that violate power or area budgets.
Skipping equivalence checks after structural changes.