VT Mix Strategy: Inputs & Outputs

Inputs and outputs contract

Inputs & Outputs for VT Mix Strategy focuses on HVT/SVT/LVT cell mix, setup/hold slack distribution, leakage budget. The goal is to connect observed QoR movement to mechanism, ownership, and regression risk.

Synthesis closure fails when teams optimize against different assumptions. Treat these artifacts as a signed handoff contract.

INPUTS
  - RTL tag and compile switches
  - SDC / policy constraints
  - Library and operating views
  - Optional physical estimates (topo/congestion)

OUTPUTS
  - QoR timing/area/power reports
  - transform/mapping summaries
  - owner-tagged closure memo
  - regression matrix verdict

Flow sequence

SYNTHESIS FLOW — VT Mix Strategy

RTL + constraints
      |
      v
elaboration + checks
      |
      v
mapping + optimization
      |
      v
QoR reports (timing/area/power)
      |
      v
incremental ECO + regression

Primary metric: HVT/SVT/LVT cell mix, setup/hold slack distribution, leakage budget

Ownership map

OWNERSHIP MAP — VT Mix Strategy

artifact              owner
----------------      -----------------
compile owner       synthesis owner
timing/power owner  power owner
cross-team review   STA owner

Every QoR movement needs a named owner before ECO.

Synthesis deep dive

PPA closure is a constrained tradeoff problem, not a timing-only exercise.

Concept diagram

PPA TRIAD

timing target <-> power budget <-> area cap

Metric graph

PARETO PROGRESSION

early runs      o o
balanced point    o
over-tuned          o (risk)

Reports and artifacts

• VT mix

• leakage trend

• dynamic power trend

• PPA Pareto table

Mini case study

LVT-heavy fix recovered setup but violated leakage target; balanced VT strategy closed both.

Debug branches

• Timing-only claims need power check

• Validate hold on VT swaps

• Use Pareto memo

Senior review question

Ask: what evidence proves this QoR move is real and stable?

Key takeaways

• State exact run context (RTL, SDC, libs, switches) with every QoR claim.

• Re-run timing, area, and power regressions after each synthesis ECO.

Common pitfalls

• Comparing runs with mismatched constraints or library views.

• Timing-only fixes that violate power or area budgets.

• Skipping equivalence checks after structural changes.

Principal synthesis review addendum

VT assignment trades delay against leakage; poor mix causes either timing misses or unnecessary static power burn.

Metric: HVT/SVT/LVT cell mix, setup/hold slack distribution, leakage budget