QoR Dashboard & Trend Triage: Software / Programmer View

RTL / implementation view

RTL clocking and intent style determine which synthesis constraints are legal.

What designers feel

• QoR sensitivity to small RTL edits

• Unexpected retiming blockers

• Clock-gating mismatch

RTL structure impact

• Pipeline boundaries

• Enable semantics

• Hierarchy and attributes

Synthesis interaction

• Compile effort knobs

• Retiming permissions

• Preserve policy scope

RTL-side mitigations

• Constraint/code co-review

• Stable naming for ECO

• Formal-first posture

RTL -> synthesis check for QoR Dashboard & Trend Triage
// verify mapping intent before compile signoff

Layer the designer touches

SYNTHESIS OWNERSHIP LAYERS — QoR Dashboard & Trend Triage

layer               owns                          failure mode
----------------    ---------------------------   -------------------------
constraints         clocks/exceptions/policy      fake QoR optimism
mapping             cell choices/structure        depth/fanout regressions
optimization        timing/power tradeoffs        one-metric overfitting
physical-aware      topo/congestion estimates     handoff delta surprises
closure             ECO order/regression          fixes break other corners

Synthesis deep dive

Constraint hygiene determines whether synthesis QoR is trustworthy.

Concept diagram

CONSTRAINT FLOW

RTL intent -> synthesis SDC -> compile checks -> QoR dashboard -> review gate

Metric graph

QOR HEALTH

constraint lint pass   ███████████████
unconstrained count    ███
policy violations      ██

Reports and artifacts

• compile QoR

• unconstrained endpoints

• constraint lint

• policy audit log

Mini case study

Nightly WNS improved but unconstrained paths jumped; strict SDC lint restored true QoR picture.

Debug branches

• Diff SDC first

• Audit dont_touch scope

• Track unconstrained trend weekly

Senior review question

Ask: what evidence proves this QoR move is real and stable?

Key takeaways

• State exact run context (RTL, SDC, libs, switches) with every QoR claim.

• Re-run timing, area, and power regressions after each synthesis ECO.

Common pitfalls

• Comparing runs with mismatched constraints or library views.

• Timing-only fixes that violate power or area budgets.

• Skipping equivalence checks after structural changes.

Principal synthesis review addendum

QoR closure is a trend-management problem: dashboard baselines catch regressions early and keep optimization decisions tied to measurable outcomes.

Metric: WNS/TNS trend, area delta, dynamic/leakage trend, compile runtime