Synthesis & Logic Optimization · All levels

QoR Dashboard & Trend Triage: Step-by-Step Walkthrough

Step-by-Step Walkthrough for QoR Dashboard & Trend Triage.

Step-by-step analysis walkthrough

Use when you own QoR Dashboard & Trend Triage in a synthesis closure review.

  1. Confirm exact run context (RTL/SDC/lib/switch set).

  2. Open section QoR dashboard and identify first drift.

  3. Inspect topic-level report for mechanism evidence.

  4. Determine owner and candidate reversible action.

  5. Apply one change only; avoid bundled fixes.

  6. Run full timing/area/power checks.

  7. Validate side effects on neighboring path groups.

  8. Publish memo with outcome and residual risk.

Artifacts to collect

  • QoR dashboard snapshot, baseline diff, closure memo

  • QoR dashboard

  • run manifest

  • constraint diff

  • regression matrix

Decision memo template

diagram
SYNTHESIS DECISION MEMO — QoR Dashboard & Trend Triage
run context:
observed metric:
hypothesis:
fix:
regression:
owners: synthesis lead, program owner, STA owner

Reference visuals

QoR dashboard lanes

diagram
QOR DASHBOARD
timing lane : WNS / TNS / endpoint count
area lane   : cell area / buffer %
power lane  : dynamic / leakage / clock %
runtime lane: compile time / memory

Synthesis deep dive

Constraint hygiene determines whether synthesis QoR is trustworthy.

Concept diagram

diagram
CONSTRAINT FLOW

RTL intent -> synthesis SDC -> compile checks -> QoR dashboard -> review gate

Metric graph

diagram
QOR HEALTH

constraint lint pass   ███████████████
unconstrained count    ███
policy violations      ██

Reports and artifacts

  • compile QoR

  • unconstrained endpoints

  • constraint lint

  • policy audit log

Mini case study

Nightly WNS improved but unconstrained paths jumped; strict SDC lint restored true QoR picture.

Debug branches

  • Diff SDC first

  • Audit dont_touch scope

  • Track unconstrained trend weekly

Senior review question

Ask: what evidence proves this QoR move is real and stable?

Key takeaways

  • State exact run context (RTL, SDC, libs, switches) with every QoR claim.

  • Re-run timing, area, and power regressions after each synthesis ECO.

Common pitfalls

  • Comparing runs with mismatched constraints or library views.

  • Timing-only fixes that violate power or area budgets.

  • Skipping equivalence checks after structural changes.

Principal synthesis review addendum

QoR closure is a trend-management problem: dashboard baselines catch regressions early and keep optimization decisions tied to measurable outcomes.

Metric: WNS/TNS trend, area delta, dynamic/leakage trend, compile runtime