Synthesis & Logic Optimization · All levels

Datapath Debug: Reports & Metrics

Reports & Metrics for Datapath Debug.

Reports and metrics

Reports & Metrics for Datapath Debug focuses on datapath QoR regression rate, functional mismatch escapes, root-cause latency. The goal is to connect observed QoR movement to mechanism, ownership, and regression risk.

A report is useful only when it supports decisions. For Datapath Debug, read metric movement with baseline context and expected budget.

Metric movement

diagram
QOR TREND — Datapath Debug

metric quality
  ^
  |                      target band
  |                o  o  o
  |            o
  |      o  regression
  +----------------------------------> synthesis iteration
   baseline    tuning     signoff-ready

Track: datapath QoR regression rate, functional mismatch escapes, root-cause latency
  • Track datapath QoR regression rate, functional mismatch escapes, root-cause latency with exact run manifests.

  • Keep timing/area/power side-by-side in review dashboards.

  • Require one-sentence mechanism hypothesis for every major delta.

  • Store before/after artifacts with owner signoff.

Synthesis deep dive

Datapath and retiming gains are only real if formal and timing remain clean.

Concept diagram

diagram
DATAPATH + RETIME

operator inference -> stage balancing -> formal proof -> QoR validation

Metric graph

diagram
FREQUENCY VS LATENCY

Fmax gain   ████████
latency cost ████

Reports and artifacts

  • retiming report

  • datapath inference log

  • equivalence status

  • latency impact sheet

Mini case study

Retiming met frequency target, but missing formal hooks delayed closure by two days.

Debug branches

  • Check retime blockers

  • Formal first for aggressive moves

  • Compare with pipeline option

Senior review question

Ask: what evidence proves this QoR move is real and stable?

Key takeaways

  • State exact run context (RTL, SDC, libs, switches) with every QoR claim.

  • Re-run timing, area, and power regressions after each synthesis ECO.

Common pitfalls

  • Comparing runs with mismatched constraints or library views.

  • Timing-only fixes that violate power or area budgets.

  • Skipping equivalence checks after structural changes.

Report reading lens