Synthesis & Logic Optimization · All levels

Datapath Inference: Step-by-Step Walkthrough

Step-by-Step Walkthrough for Datapath Inference.

Step-by-step analysis walkthrough

Use when you own Datapath Inference in a synthesis closure review.

  1. Confirm exact run context (RTL/SDC/lib/switch set).

  2. Open section QoR dashboard and identify first drift.

  3. Inspect topic-level report for mechanism evidence.

  4. Determine owner and candidate reversible action.

  5. Apply one change only; avoid bundled fixes.

  6. Run full timing/area/power checks.

  7. Validate side effects on neighboring path groups.

  8. Publish memo with outcome and residual risk.

Artifacts to collect

  • datapath extraction report, inferred operator map, QoR comparison

  • QoR dashboard

  • run manifest

  • constraint diff

  • regression matrix

Decision memo template

diagram
SYNTHESIS DECISION MEMO — Datapath Inference
run context:
observed metric:
hypothesis:
fix:
regression:
owners: synthesis owner, RTL owner, library owner

Reference visuals

Datapath extraction

diagram
RTL arithmetic pattern
  -> operator recognition
  -> datapath macro mapping
  -> depth and area reduction

Synthesis deep dive

Datapath and retiming gains are only real if formal and timing remain clean.

Concept diagram

diagram
DATAPATH + RETIME

operator inference -> stage balancing -> formal proof -> QoR validation

Metric graph

diagram
FREQUENCY VS LATENCY

Fmax gain   ████████
latency cost ████

Reports and artifacts

  • retiming report

  • datapath inference log

  • equivalence status

  • latency impact sheet

Mini case study

Retiming met frequency target, but missing formal hooks delayed closure by two days.

Debug branches

  • Check retime blockers

  • Formal first for aggressive moves

  • Compare with pipeline option

Senior review question

Ask: what evidence proves this QoR move is real and stable?

Key takeaways

  • State exact run context (RTL, SDC, libs, switches) with every QoR claim.

  • Re-run timing, area, and power regressions after each synthesis ECO.

Common pitfalls

  • Comparing runs with mismatched constraints or library views.

  • Timing-only fixes that violate power or area budgets.

  • Skipping equivalence checks after structural changes.

Principal synthesis review addendum

Datapath-aware synthesis recognizes arithmetic patterns and maps them to optimized structures; RTL shape determines whether inference succeeds.

Metric: inferred arithmetic structure count, depth reduction, datapath area delta