Synthesis & Logic Optimization · All levels

ECO Netlist Patches: Inputs & Outputs

Inputs & Outputs for ECO Netlist Patches.

Inputs and outputs contract

Inputs & Outputs for ECO Netlist Patches focuses on patch count, setup/hold recovery, patch-induced side effects. The goal is to connect observed QoR movement to mechanism, ownership, and regression risk.

Synthesis closure fails when teams optimize against different assumptions. Treat these artifacts as a signed handoff contract.

diagram
INPUTS
  - RTL tag and compile switches
  - SDC / policy constraints
  - Library and operating views
  - Optional physical estimates (topo/congestion)

OUTPUTS
  - QoR timing/area/power reports
  - transform/mapping summaries
  - owner-tagged closure memo
  - regression matrix verdict

Flow sequence

diagram
SYNTHESIS FLOW — ECO Netlist Patches

RTL + constraints
      |
      v
elaboration + checks
      |
      v
mapping + optimization
      |
      v
QoR reports (timing/area/power)
      |
      v
incremental ECO + regression

Primary metric: patch count, setup/hold recovery, patch-induced side effects

Ownership map

diagram
OWNERSHIP MAP — ECO Netlist Patches

artifact              owner
----------------      -----------------
compile owner       synthesis owner
timing/power owner  STA owner
cross-team review   formal owner

Every QoR movement needs a named owner before ECO.

Synthesis deep dive

Incremental and ECO synthesis protect schedule only with strict regression discipline.

Concept diagram

diagram
INCREMENTAL ECO LOOP

identify delta -> localized compile -> patch -> regression -> release

Metric graph

diagram
ECO CYCLE TIME

full compile      ███████████
incremental       █████

Reports and artifacts

  • incremental reuse

  • ECO patch list

  • LEC status

  • regression matrix

Mini case study

Localized compile cut turnaround 40%, but skipped LEC caused rollback.

Debug branches

  • Reuse ratio is not enough

  • Patch locality check

  • Always include equivalence hooks

Senior review question

Ask: what evidence proves this QoR move is real and stable?

Key takeaways

  • State exact run context (RTL, SDC, libs, switches) with every QoR claim.

  • Re-run timing, area, and power regressions after each synthesis ECO.

Common pitfalls

  • Comparing runs with mismatched constraints or library views.

  • Timing-only fixes that violate power or area budgets.

  • Skipping equivalence checks after structural changes.

Principal synthesis review addendum

ECO patching edits gate-level logic for urgent fixes; patch quality depends on locality, observability, and verification closure.

Metric: patch count, setup/hold recovery, patch-induced side effects