Synthesis & Logic Optimization · All levels

Equivalence Hooks: Comparison Matrix

Comparison Matrix for Equivalence Hooks.

Comparison matrix

Patch aggressiveness trades turnaround time against validation burden.

diagram
+------------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| Approach         | Strength       | Weakness       | Best when      |
+------------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| Conservative     | stable         | slower         | new design spin |
| Balanced         | practical      | needs monitoring | normal closure |
| Aggressive       | fast           | higher risk    | schedule crunch |
| Structural       | durable        | long loop      | repeat offender |
+------------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+

When to choose each approach

  • Select strategy by risk budget, not convenience.

Interview traps

  • Skipping manifest diff

  • No side-effect regression

Evidence comparison

diagram
SYNTHESIS EVIDENCE MATRIX — Equivalence Hooks

+--------------------+------------------------+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| Evidence            | Tells you              | Does not prove           | Next action             |
+--------------------+------------------------+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| compile QoR report  | metric movement        | root-cause class         | inspect transform logs  |
| SDC diff            | constraint drift       | library quality          | rerun with baseline SDC |
| library map diff    | cell view changes      | RTL intent quality       | lock/validate lib set   |
| topo vs logical QoR | physical correlation   | final route signoff      | PD trial correlation    |
| regression matrix   | closure stability      | architecture optimality  | decide merge/rollback   |
+--------------------+------------------------+--------------------------+-------------------------+

Synthesis deep dive

Incremental and ECO synthesis protect schedule only with strict regression discipline.

Concept diagram

diagram
INCREMENTAL ECO LOOP

identify delta -> localized compile -> patch -> regression -> release

Metric graph

diagram
ECO CYCLE TIME

full compile      ███████████
incremental       █████

Reports and artifacts

  • incremental reuse

  • ECO patch list

  • LEC status

  • regression matrix

Mini case study

Localized compile cut turnaround 40%, but skipped LEC caused rollback.

Debug branches

  • Reuse ratio is not enough

  • Patch locality check

  • Always include equivalence hooks

Senior review question

Ask: what evidence proves this QoR move is real and stable?

Key takeaways

  • State exact run context (RTL, SDC, libs, switches) with every QoR claim.

  • Re-run timing, area, and power regressions after each synthesis ECO.

Common pitfalls

  • Comparing runs with mismatched constraints or library views.

  • Timing-only fixes that violate power or area budgets.

  • Skipping equivalence checks after structural changes.

Principal synthesis review addendum

Equivalence hooks align synthesis and ECO transformations with formal checking so aggressive optimization remains provably correct.

Metric: LEC pass rate, unresolved points, debug turnaround