Synthesis & Logic Optimization · All levels

Structuring & Buffering: Step-by-Step Walkthrough

Step-by-Step Walkthrough for Structuring & Buffering.

Step-by-step analysis walkthrough

Use when you own Structuring & Buffering in a synthesis closure review.

  1. Confirm exact run context (RTL/SDC/lib/switch set).

  2. Open section QoR dashboard and identify first drift.

  3. Inspect topic-level report for mechanism evidence.

  4. Determine owner and candidate reversible action.

  5. Apply one change only; avoid bundled fixes.

  6. Run full timing/area/power checks.

  7. Validate side effects on neighboring path groups.

  8. Publish memo with outcome and residual risk.

Artifacts to collect

  • fanout report, transition report, structure diff

  • QoR dashboard

  • run manifest

  • constraint diff

  • regression matrix

Decision memo template

diagram
SYNTHESIS DECISION MEMO — Structuring & Buffering
run context:
observed metric:
hypothesis:
fix:
regression:
owners: synthesis owner, PD owner, STA owner

Reference visuals

Structure vs buffer tradeoff

diagram
critical cone
  |-- restructure logic (depth)
  |-- add buffers (fanout/slew)

Choose by dominant delay mode.

Synthesis deep dive

Mapping converts logic intent into real PPA outcomes.

Concept diagram

diagram
MAPPING LOOP

boolean net -> library mapping -> optimization -> report and iterate

Metric graph

diagram
MAPPING IMPACT

depth reduction   ███████
fanout cleanup    █████
runtime overhead  ███

Reports and artifacts

  • mapping summary

  • critical path cell list

  • fanout/slew report

  • library coverage

Mini case study

Cell-heavy critical path improved after restructuring, while blanket buffering had worsened power.

Debug branches

  • Depth issue -> structure

  • Fanout issue -> buffers

  • Library mismatch -> view audit

Senior review question

Ask: what evidence proves this QoR move is real and stable?

Key takeaways

  • State exact run context (RTL, SDC, libs, switches) with every QoR claim.

  • Re-run timing, area, and power regressions after each synthesis ECO.

Common pitfalls

  • Comparing runs with mismatched constraints or library views.

  • Timing-only fixes that violate power or area budgets.

  • Skipping equivalence checks after structural changes.

Principal synthesis review addendum

Structuring rewrites logic cones and buffering controls transition/fanout; both directly affect timing, area, and power in different corners.

Metric: logic depth, fanout violations, buffer count, slew violations