Synthesis & Logic Optimization · All levels

Timing-Driven Synthesis: Inputs & Outputs

Inputs & Outputs for Timing-Driven Synthesis.

Inputs and outputs contract

Inputs & Outputs for Timing-Driven Synthesis focuses on critical path WNS, violating endpoint count, compile effort distribution. The goal is to connect observed QoR movement to mechanism, ownership, and regression risk.

Synthesis closure fails when teams optimize against different assumptions. Treat these artifacts as a signed handoff contract.

diagram
INPUTS
  - RTL tag and compile switches
  - SDC / policy constraints
  - Library and operating views
  - Optional physical estimates (topo/congestion)

OUTPUTS
  - QoR timing/area/power reports
  - transform/mapping summaries
  - owner-tagged closure memo
  - regression matrix verdict

Flow sequence

diagram
SYNTHESIS FLOW — Timing-Driven Synthesis

RTL + constraints
      |
      v
elaboration + checks
      |
      v
mapping + optimization
      |
      v
QoR reports (timing/area/power)
      |
      v
incremental ECO + regression

Primary metric: critical path WNS, violating endpoint count, compile effort distribution

Ownership map

diagram
OWNERSHIP MAP — Timing-Driven Synthesis

artifact              owner
----------------      -----------------
compile owner       synthesis lead
timing/power owner  STA owner

Every QoR movement needs a named owner before ECO.

Synthesis deep dive

Mapping converts logic intent into real PPA outcomes.

Concept diagram

diagram
MAPPING LOOP

boolean net -> library mapping -> optimization -> report and iterate

Metric graph

diagram
MAPPING IMPACT

depth reduction   ███████
fanout cleanup    █████
runtime overhead  ███

Reports and artifacts

  • mapping summary

  • critical path cell list

  • fanout/slew report

  • library coverage

Mini case study

Cell-heavy critical path improved after restructuring, while blanket buffering had worsened power.

Debug branches

  • Depth issue -> structure

  • Fanout issue -> buffers

  • Library mismatch -> view audit

Senior review question

Ask: what evidence proves this QoR move is real and stable?

Key takeaways

  • State exact run context (RTL, SDC, libs, switches) with every QoR claim.

  • Re-run timing, area, and power regressions after each synthesis ECO.

Common pitfalls

  • Comparing runs with mismatched constraints or library views.

  • Timing-only fixes that violate power or area budgets.

  • Skipping equivalence checks after structural changes.

Principal synthesis review addendum

Timing-driven compile focuses optimization where slack is most constrained, balancing global QoR instead of over-optimizing non-critical logic.

Metric: critical path WNS, violating endpoint count, compile effort distribution