CDC / RDC · All levels
Multi-bit Crossing Strategies: Review Checklist
Review Checklist for Multi-bit Crossing Strategies.
Review checklist
Review Checklist for Multi-bit Crossing Strategies focuses on coherency guarantee coverage, data corruption incidents, protocol overhead. The goal is to convert issue observations into mechanism-backed closure decisions.
Crossing and reset intent are explicitly classified.
Protocol assumptions are documented and checked.
Critical issues have owners and dates.
Waivers include mechanism, containment, and expiry.
Regression matrix includes stress and milestone modes.
Owners signed: architecture owner, RTL owner, CDC lead.
Signoff ownership
OWNERSHIP MAP — Multi-bit Crossing Strategies
artifact owner
---------------------- -------------------------
design intent architecture owner
verification evidence RTL owner
signoff decision CDC lead
Every open CDC/RDC issue needs one accountable owner before waiver or fix.CDC/RDC deep dive
Reconvergence failures are timing + logic coupling hazards.
Concept diagram
RECONVERGENCE
branch A sync -- -> merge logic -> illegal combination window
branch B sync --/Metric graph
HAZARD REPRODUCTION RATE
before fix: 1/2000 runs
after fix: 0/100000 runsReports and artifacts
reconvergence warnings
gray transition checks
hazard replay traces
multi-bit strategy map
Mini case study
Gray pointer was legal, but downstream merge decoded mixed-era values during burst stress.
Debug branches
Trace fanin cones
align event windows
verify decode assumptions
Senior review question
Ask: what evidence proves this risk is closed for silicon, not just tool-clean?
Key takeaways
State crossing class, assumptions, and owner with every issue.
Run structural and dynamic regressions after each fix.
Common pitfalls
Treating all warnings as equivalent risk.
Waiving issues without containment evidence.
Skipping reset and reconvergence stress after CDC fixes.
Principal CDC/RDC review addendum
Bundled-data handshakes, FIFOs, source-synchronous strobes, and encoded protocols each trade latency, area, and proof complexity.
Metric: coherency guarantee coverage, data corruption incidents, protocol overhead