SoC Integration · All levels

Coherency & Ordering Integration: Review Checklist

Review Checklist for Coherency & Ordering Integration.

Review checklist

Review Checklist for Coherency & Ordering Integration focuses on stale-data escapes, coherency retry rate, fence latency. The goal is to map symptoms to boundary contracts, owner actions, and regression-proof closure.

  • Baseline manifest and revision are explicit.

  • Boundary contracts for this topic are current and approved.

  • Ownership map covers all open issues.

  • Focused and full regression evidence both exist.

  • Residual risks are either closed or bounded via waiver policy.

  • Owners signed: system architect, cache owner, verification lead.

Signoff ownership

diagram
OWNERSHIP MAP — Coherency & Ordering Integration

artifact             owner
-----------------    -----------------
primary owner     system architect
co-owner          cache owner
review owner      verification lead

No top-level issue should remain ownerless beyond one review cycle.

SoC deep dive

Fabric correctness and contention behavior must be proven together.

Concept diagram

diagram
FABRIC FLOW
masters -> routers/VCs -> slaves + memory

Metric graph

diagram
LATENCY TAIL
p50 ███
p95 ██████
p99 ██████████

Reports and artifacts

  • NoC contention heatmap

  • ordering violation report

  • QoS fairness summary

  • protocol trace

Mini case study

Bandwidth looked fine at average load, but p99 tail violated SLA due to arbitration starvation.

Debug branches

  • Isolate traffic class

  • Check ordering assumptions

  • Audit arbitration policy

Senior review question

Ask: what baseline, owner, and artifact prove this topic is truly closed?

Key takeaways

  • State baseline manifest and owner with every closure metric.

  • Run cross-domain regression after every top-level fix.

Common pitfalls

  • Comparing results across different manifests.

  • Unowned issues slipping through review cycles.

  • Waiving risks without expiry and validation plan.

Principal SoC review addendum

Coherency correctness requires consistent shareability, home-node behavior, and ordering barriers across CPU, DMA, and accelerator masters.

Metric: stale-data escapes, coherency retry rate, fence latency