CDC / RDC · All levels

CDC Tool Flow: Expanded Case Study

Expanded Case Study for CDC Tool Flow.

Extended case study

Milestone review flags analysis runtime, violation classification completeness, delta noise between runs around CDC Tool Flow.

Background

Team believed crossings were stable until stress mode exposed intermittent anomalies.

Symptoms observed

  • analysis runtime, violation classification completeness, delta noise between runs regression

  • Mismatch between structural report and dynamic behavior

  • Waiver debate under schedule pressure

Investigation timeline

  1. Freeze design, reset, and tool configuration tags.

  2. Reproduce failing scenario with minimized stimulus.

  3. Map path/protocol/reset dependencies.

  4. Classify root cause and containment options.

  5. Execute minimal safe fix.

  6. Run stress regression and review board.

Root cause

Root cause links to CDC Tool Flow: Robust CDC signoff combines structural analysis, protocol checks, reset analysis, and targeted formal/simulation evidence with consistent setup tagging.

Fix and validation

  • Targeted RTL/protocol/reset correction

  • Evidence refresh

  • Signoff board decision

Lessons learned

  • Treat waivers as temporary risk contracts

  • Track owner and expiry

  • Regression before closure

diagram
CASE STUDY — CDC Tool Flow
critical issues before / after / signoff

Crossing sequence under stress

diagram
CROSSING FLOW — CDC Tool Flow

source clock domain -> launch signal -> crossing structure -> destination sample
      |                    |                 |                    |
   source FF           protocol           sync / fifo         destination FF

Key metric: analysis runtime, violation classification completeness, delta noise between runs

CDC/RDC deep dive

Signoff is an evidence governance problem across teams.

Concept diagram

diagram
CDC SIGNOFF LOOP

analysis -> triage -> fix/waive -> review gate -> dashboard

Metric graph

diagram
CRITICAL OPEN COUNT

week1 34
week2 22
week3 10
week4 0

Reports and artifacts

  • critical by owner

  • waiver quality

  • review gate status

  • closure trend

Mini case study

Pass rates improved while critical waivers aged out of policy; dashboard exposed hidden risk.

Debug branches

  • Separate quality from quantity metrics

  • enforce waiver expiry

  • run gate checklists consistently

Senior review question

Ask: what evidence proves this risk is closed for silicon, not just tool-clean?

Key takeaways

  • State crossing class, assumptions, and owner with every issue.

  • Run structural and dynamic regressions after each fix.

Common pitfalls

  • Treating all warnings as equivalent risk.

  • Waiving issues without containment evidence.

  • Skipping reset and reconvergence stress after CDC fixes.

Principal CDC/RDC review addendum

Robust CDC signoff combines structural analysis, protocol checks, reset analysis, and targeted formal/simulation evidence with consistent setup tagging.

Metric: analysis runtime, violation classification completeness, delta noise between runs