CDC / RDC · All levels
CDC Tool Flow: Expanded Case Study
Expanded Case Study for CDC Tool Flow.
Extended case study
Milestone review flags analysis runtime, violation classification completeness, delta noise between runs around CDC Tool Flow.
Background
Team believed crossings were stable until stress mode exposed intermittent anomalies.
Symptoms observed
analysis runtime, violation classification completeness, delta noise between runs regression
Mismatch between structural report and dynamic behavior
Waiver debate under schedule pressure
Investigation timeline
Freeze design, reset, and tool configuration tags.
Reproduce failing scenario with minimized stimulus.
Map path/protocol/reset dependencies.
Classify root cause and containment options.
Execute minimal safe fix.
Run stress regression and review board.
Root cause
Root cause links to CDC Tool Flow: Robust CDC signoff combines structural analysis, protocol checks, reset analysis, and targeted formal/simulation evidence with consistent setup tagging.
Fix and validation
Targeted RTL/protocol/reset correction
Evidence refresh
Signoff board decision
Lessons learned
Treat waivers as temporary risk contracts
Track owner and expiry
Regression before closure
CASE STUDY — CDC Tool Flow
critical issues before / after / signoffCrossing sequence under stress
CROSSING FLOW — CDC Tool Flow
source clock domain -> launch signal -> crossing structure -> destination sample
| | | |
source FF protocol sync / fifo destination FF
Key metric: analysis runtime, violation classification completeness, delta noise between runsCDC/RDC deep dive
Signoff is an evidence governance problem across teams.
Concept diagram
CDC SIGNOFF LOOP
analysis -> triage -> fix/waive -> review gate -> dashboardMetric graph
CRITICAL OPEN COUNT
week1 34
week2 22
week3 10
week4 0Reports and artifacts
critical by owner
waiver quality
review gate status
closure trend
Mini case study
Pass rates improved while critical waivers aged out of policy; dashboard exposed hidden risk.
Debug branches
Separate quality from quantity metrics
enforce waiver expiry
run gate checklists consistently
Senior review question
Ask: what evidence proves this risk is closed for silicon, not just tool-clean?
Key takeaways
State crossing class, assumptions, and owner with every issue.
Run structural and dynamic regressions after each fix.
Common pitfalls
Treating all warnings as equivalent risk.
Waiving issues without containment evidence.
Skipping reset and reconvergence stress after CDC fixes.
Principal CDC/RDC review addendum
Robust CDC signoff combines structural analysis, protocol checks, reset analysis, and targeted formal/simulation evidence with consistent setup tagging.
Metric: analysis runtime, violation classification completeness, delta noise between runs