CDC/RDC Whiteboard Framework: Review Checklist

Review checklist

Review Checklist for CDC/RDC Whiteboard Framework focuses on problem decomposition quality, mechanism-first answer quality. The goal is to convert issue observations into mechanism-backed closure decisions.

• Crossing and reset intent are explicitly classified.

• Protocol assumptions are documented and checked.

• Critical issues have owners and dates.

• Waivers include mechanism, containment, and expiry.

• Regression matrix includes stress and milestone modes.

• Owners signed: candidate, interviewer, hiring panel.

Signoff ownership

OWNERSHIP MAP — CDC/RDC Whiteboard Framework

artifact                  owner
----------------------    -------------------------
design intent           candidate
verification evidence   interviewer
signoff decision        hiring panel

Every open CDC/RDC issue needs one accountable owner before waiver or fix.

CDC/RDC deep dive

Interview performance reflects production signoff thinking quality.

Concept diagram

INTERVIEW FLOW

classify -> explain mechanism -> propose fix -> state regression

Metric graph

PRACTICE SCORE

session1 62%
session2 78%
session3 89%

Reports and artifacts

• scenario completion

• answer rubric scores

• trap recovery quality

Mini case study

Candidate gave command-heavy answer but missed risk framing and waiver governance.

Debug branches

• Use mechanism-first structure

• name ownership and evidence

• close with signoff decision

Senior review question

Ask: what evidence proves this risk is closed for silicon, not just tool-clean?

Key takeaways

• State crossing class, assumptions, and owner with every issue.

• Run structural and dynamic regressions after each fix.

Common pitfalls

• Treating all warnings as equivalent risk.

• Waiving issues without containment evidence.

• Skipping reset and reconvergence stress after CDC fixes.