Signoff vs Implementation Views: Step-by-Step Walkthrough

Step-by-step analysis walkthrough

Use when you own Signoff vs Implementation Views in a timing war room.

1. Open signoff scenario list — note worst WNS corner.

2. report_timing -max/-min on failing group.

3. Trace launch and capture clocks on critical path.

4. Check exceptions and generated clocks on path.

5. Break down cell vs net delay.

6. Compare implementation vs signoff view if delta suspicious.

7. Assign owner: RTL, synth, PD, CTS, SI.

8. Propose ECO with hold/SI check plan.

9. Run regression matrix.

10. Update closure dashboard and memo.

Artifacts to collect

• view comparison report, SPEF tag manifest, delta slack log

• SDC file

• SPEF tag

• MMMC scenario list

• ECO ticket

Decision memo template

STA DECISION MEMO — Signoff vs Implementation Views
corner/mode:
WNS/TNS:
hypothesis:
ECO:
regression:
owners: STA lead, PD owner, extraction owner

Reference visuals

View comparison

SAME NETLIST — TWO VIEWS

impl_view SPEF (typical)     WNS = +50ps
signoff_view SPEF (cworst)   WNS = -30ps

Delta is expected; panic only if delta exceeds historical bound.

STA deep dive

Signoff WNS is the minimum across the full scenario matrix.

Concept diagram

MMMC

corners (ss/tt/ff) x modes (func/test) x views (signoff RC)
= scenario set -> min(WNS) is signoff

Metric graph

WNS HEATMAP BY CORNER

        ss    tt    ff
setup  -80   +10   +5
hold   -15   -2    -8

Reports and artifacts

• per-corner WNS

• mode summary

• lib map audit

• view delta

Mini case study

Passed TT typical but failed SS hold — signoff matrix was incomplete; added low-voltage mode.

Debug branches

• Isolate failing scenario first

• Never compare unlike SPEF tags

Senior review question

Ask: what corner/mode/view proves this topic is closed or failing?

Key takeaways

• State corner, mode, view, and database tag with every slack claim.

• Run setup and hold plus MMMC regression after every ECO.

Common pitfalls

• Comparing STA runs with different SPEF or SDC tags.

• Broad false_path to green-wash violations.

• Setup-only ECO without hold check.

Principal STA review addendum

Implementation and signoff use different parasitic corners and analysis views; comparing them without mapping causes false panic or false confidence.

Metric: view delta WNS, parasitic corner mismatch, SPEF vs signoff RC gap