Skew, reset timing, and mode transitions dominate bring-up escapes.
Guardband margins
late ECO spillover
Emergency frequency guards
clocking overhead
Cross-domain path regressions
late closure churn
Route congestion from top-level fixes
package-driven detours
Re-validation of waived assumptions
PPA RISK — Clock/Reset + DFT Interactions
area/power/timing confidence vs integration velocityIntegration discipline reduces expensive late-stage silicon risk.
BEFORE / AFTER FIX — Clock/Reset + DFT Interactions
risk index
0 | --- target
40 | ● regression
65 | ● before fix
20 | ● after fix
+-------------------------------> iteration
Always verify collateral, regression suite, and owner signoff.Clock/reset assumptions must be globally consistent across functional and test modes.
CLOCK/RESET FLOW
pll lock -> clock enable -> reset release -> domain readyBOOT STABILITY
stable boots ████████
reset hangs ███clock architecture report
reset release timing
mode matrix
boot trace summary
Intermittent boot hang traced to one domain releasing reset before dependent clock was stable.
Check mode-specific constraints
Trace reset dependencies
Correlate firmware sequencing
Ask: what baseline, owner, and artifact prove this topic is truly closed?
State baseline manifest and owner with every closure metric.
Run cross-domain regression after every top-level fix.
Comparing results across different manifests.
Unowned issues slipping through review cycles.
Waiving risks without expiry and validation plan.
Functional and test clocks/resets share infrastructure; missing mode-specific constraints and mux assumptions often break ATPG or silicon bring-up.
Metric: scan mode timing escapes, test-mode bring-up issues
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown