STA Mastery · All levels

Variation Signoff Dashboard: Interview Drills

Interview Drills for Variation Signoff Dashboard.

Interview drills

Interview Drills for Variation Signoff Dashboard focuses on WNS/TNS across derate corners, hold/setup closure rate, margin trend. The goal is to connect the observable symptom to timing mechanism, ownership, and regression risk.

diagram
PROMPT
You see WNS/TNS across derate corners, hold/setup closure rate, margin trend on Variation Signoff Dashboard. Walk through root cause and fix.

STRONG ANSWER
1. Names corner/mode/view and path group.
2. Explains Variation signoff tracks closure across the full derate matrix and flags corners where margin is consumed by policy not implementation.
3. Requests signoff dashboard screenshot, weekly WNS trend, closure memo.
4. Proposes one reduced sequence and one system regression.

WEAK ANSWER
Jumps to upsizing cells, widening routes, or blaming tools without reading constraints and path delay.

Diagram to draw on the whiteboard

Weekly WNS trend

diagram
WNS TREND (all signoff scenarios)

 0ps |           ___----
-50ps |      ____/
-100ps| ____/
      +-----------------> week
      w1   w2   w3   w4

Root-cause tree to narrate

diagram
ROOT-CAUSE TREE — Variation Signoff Dashboard

WNS/TNS across derate corners, hold/setup closure rate, margin trend looks wrong
        |
   same netlist tag?
     /        \
   no          yes
   |            |
 view/SDC     real path or
 mismatch     constraint bug
 /    \           |
lib   SPEF    delay breakdown
diff  diff    cell vs net

STA deep dive

Variation policy is negotiated margin, not a tool checkbox.

Concept diagram

diagram
VARIATION STACK

nominal delay + OCV/AOCV/POCV margin = signoff delay

Metric graph

diagram
DERATE IMPACT ON WNS

OCV only     WNS -120ps
AOCV         WNS -45ps
POCV         WNS -60ps (policy dependent)

Reports and artifacts

  • derate table

  • AOCV depth report

  • POCV sigma

  • hold/setup split

Mini case study

Switched to AOCV without re-baselining hold — short paths failed min analysis.

Debug branches

  • Short paths for hold

  • Policy approval for derate changes

Senior review question

Ask: what corner/mode/view proves this topic is closed or failing?

Key takeaways

  • State corner, mode, view, and database tag with every slack claim.

  • Run setup and hold plus MMMC regression after every ECO.

Common pitfalls

  • Comparing STA runs with different SPEF or SDC tags.

  • Broad false_path to green-wash violations.

  • Setup-only ECO without hold check.

Principal STA review addendum

Variation signoff tracks closure across the full derate matrix and flags corners where margin is consumed by policy not implementation.

Metric: WNS/TNS across derate corners, hold/setup closure rate, margin trend