Skip to content
DenseChip
Learn
PracticeCode labInterview

DenseChip

Navigate

Menu

LearnPracticeCode labInterview

Tools

All toolsSV editorCode repoResume
DenseChip

Practice, courses, and chip-design tools in one focused workspace.

LearnPracticeCode labInterviewToolsLearning paths

© 2026 DenseChip

AboutContactPrivacyTerms
Skip to lesson

Course contents

  • How to Use This Course
  • Reading Path
  • CDC/RDC Glossary
  • CDC/RDC Metrics Reference
  • CDC/RDC Interview Prep
  • CDC/RDC Signoff Cheatsheet
  • Clock Domains and Failure Modes8
  • Metastability and Synchronizers16
  • CDC Protocols and Handshakes16
  • Reconvergence and Gray Coding16
  • Reset Domain Crossing16
  • Architecture and Design Rules16
  • CDC Signoff Methodology24
    • CDC Tool Flow
    • CDC Constraints and STA
    • CDC Waiver Policy
    • CDC Review Gate
      • Pre-Tapeout Gates
      • Review Checklists
      • Signoff Readiness
      • Handoff to Physical Design and DFT
    • CDC Signoff Dashboard
    • Formal and Simulation CDC Verification
  • RDC Signoff16
  • Debug and Case Studies11
  • CDC and RDC Interview Prep30
  • Capstone: Sign Off a Multi-clock Peripheral4
Loading lesson

‹CDC Review Gate
  1. Topics
  2. CDC & RDC
  3. CDC Signoff Methodology
  4. CDC Review Gate
  5. Pre-Tapeout Gates

Part 7 · CDC Signoff Methodology · Advanced

Pre-Tapeout Gates

The CDC gates through a project, with entry and exit criteria for each.

On this page

    A gate is a dated decision with criteria on both sides: entry criteria say the design is ready to be judged, exit criteria say what “pass” means. CDC gates ride on the project's existing milestones so they inherit dates and authority instead of begging for both.

    The gates

    Gate

    Entry criteria

    Exit criteria

    First integration

    Setup reviewed; clock and reset intent documented

    Structural analysis runs cleanly on the integrated design; no setup errors remain

    Block signoff

    Block RTL functionally complete; boundary models generated

    No unexplained findings inside the block; boundary crossings assigned owners

    Pre-synthesis

    All blocks signed off; flat run complete

    No defect-class findings open; every waiver jointly approved with evidence

    Pre-tapeout

    Netlist available; constraints final

    Gate-level re-check clean; constraints reviewed against the final inventory; dynamic checks run

    Running the gate meeting

    The gate review itself is short when the paperwork is done beforehand: checklists completed, waiver evidence attached, dashboard history continuous. The meeting then handles only exceptions — disputed classifications, thin waiver evidence, scope disagreements. A gate meeting that re-derives basic facts from scratch is a sign the entry criteria were not enforced, and its approvals should be treated as provisional until the paperwork catches up.

    Why entry criteria matter as much as exit criteria

    A gate judged on an unready design produces waivers against noise: findings get waived because the design “will change anyway”, and those waivers linger into revisions where they no longer apply. Enforcing entry criteria — refusing to judge an unready design — is what keeps the waiver list honest. Postponing a gate is cheaper than laundering its findings.

    The flat-versus-hierarchical rhythm from the tool-flow topic maps directly onto these gates: block signoff is hierarchical, pre-synthesis and pre-tapeout are flat. Each flat gate re-checks the boundary assumptions the hierarchical work relied on.

    Common pitfall

    Merging pre-synthesis and pre-tapeout into one “final CDC review” deletes the only gate that runs on the netlist. Synthesis and ECOs change exactly the structures CDC depends on, so the netlist gate cannot be folded into an RTL one.

    Check yourself The pre-synthesis gate is due but two blocks are not signed off. The proposal is to judge the gate anyway and waive the block findings “until RTL settles”. What is wrong with this?

    It violates entry criteria and manufactures waivers against noise. The gate should be postponed; judging an unready design converts unknowns into fake approvals that outlive the revision.

    Check yourself Which gates are hierarchical and which are flat, and why?

    Block signoff is hierarchical for speed and ownership; pre-synthesis and pre-tapeout are flat to check boundary assumptions against reality. The flat gates are the proof the integration holds.

    Related topics

    • Review Checklists

    • Signoff Readiness

    • Hierarchical versus Flat Analysis

    Previous

    107 / 179

    Next: Review Checklists

    Up next

    Up nextReview Checklists

    Sign in to save progress

    Practice this lessonReport an error

    See also

    • Signoff Readiness
    • Handoff to Physical Design and DFT