CDC / RDC · All levels
Reset Debug Playbook: Worked Example
Worked Example for Reset Debug Playbook.
Worked example
Worked Example for Reset Debug Playbook focuses on reset-related failure reproduction time, first-pass root-cause hit rate. The goal is to convert issue observations into mechanism-backed closure decisions.
A milestone review shows reset-related failure reproduction time, first-pass root-cause hit rate. Teams disagree on severity. The right move is to isolate one representative issue, prove mechanism class, and decide fix or waiver with explicit residual risk.
Crossing under inspection
CROSSING FLOW — Reset Debug Playbook
source clock domain -> launch signal -> crossing structure -> destination sample
| | | |
source FF protocol sync / fifo destination FF
Key metric: reset-related failure reproduction time, first-pass root-cause hit rateReset failure timeline
t0 reset assert
t1 clock ungated
t2 reset release domain A
t3 reset release domain B
t4 first traffic
Correlate failure to exact release ordering.Capture warning, waveform, and owning module context.
Tag mode/reset/traffic state for the failure.
Validate assumptions against spec and assertions.
Compare outcome with boot waveform bundle, reset event timeline, root-cause memo.
Choose one reversible action and define regression upfront.
Did the action work?
BEFORE / AFTER — Reset Debug Playbook
open critical issues
^
| o baseline
| o after fix batch
| o after protocol proof
| o signoff-ready
+---------------------------------> closure iteration
Track issue burn-down with evidence quality, not only count.CDC/RDC deep dive
Reset release ordering is a first-order reliability contract.
Concept diagram
RESET RELEASE FLOW
assert global -> clocks stable -> sync release per domain -> first transactionMetric graph
BOOT STABILITY
passes per 1k boots: 920 -> 980 -> 999Reports and artifacts
reset dependency matrix
RDC warning classes
boot stress logs
waiver aging
Mini case study
Domain B released before producer A was valid, causing rare startup deadlock.
Debug branches
Correlate reset and clock timelines
verify async assert/sync release
exercise skewed release tests
Senior review question
Ask: what evidence proves this risk is closed for silicon, not just tool-clean?
Key takeaways
State crossing class, assumptions, and owner with every issue.
Run structural and dynamic regressions after each fix.
Common pitfalls
Treating all warnings as equivalent risk.
Waiving issues without containment evidence.
Skipping reset and reconvergence stress after CDC fixes.
Principal CDC/RDC review addendum
Reset bugs are often timing-sequence interactions across power, clocks, and reset domains; debug must isolate order, polarity, and release windows.
Metric: reset-related failure reproduction time, first-pass root-cause hit rate