Review Checklist for Pattern Signoff focuses on final coverage, escaped fault estimate, tester-ready pattern quality. The goal is to convert metric movement into mechanism, owner, and release decision.
Run tags and scenario context are explicit.
Constraints and legality assumptions are documented.
Quality, timing, and test-power checks are included.
Diagnosis evidence supports residual-risk decision.
Owners signed: DFT lead, ATPG owner, product test owner.
OWNERSHIP MAP - Pattern Signoff
artifact owner
---------------- -----------------
architecture/report DFT lead
constraints/setup ATPG owner
physical/test product test owner
Name an owner for each failing metric cluster.ATPG quality comes from fault model choice plus legal constraints, not raw pattern volume alone.
ATPG FLOW
fault model -> constraints -> generation -> simulation -> coverage closure -> signoffCOVERAGE GAP
target coverage
^
| o before closure
| o after fixes
+---------------------> iterationfault model coverage
untestable class report
constraint legality errors
pattern signoff memo
Transition coverage stalled due to clock constraints mismatch; updated at-speed capture definitions recovered target.
Classify untestable faults
Diff ATPG constraints each run
Pair coverage with pattern budget
Ask: what evidence proves this DFT decision is safe for production?
State metric, lot/corner context, and pattern tag with every claim.
Treat timing, power, and quality as one signoff problem.
Chasing coverage without legality checks.
Ignoring test-power side effects of pattern changes.
Debugging silicon without reproducible tags.
Pattern signoff validates that pattern sets meet quality, runtime, and tester format requirements before tapeout and production handoff.
Metric: final coverage, escaped fault estimate, tester-ready pattern quality
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown