DFT / ATPG · All levels
DFT Whiteboard Framework: Review Checklist
Review Checklist for DFT Whiteboard Framework.
Review checklist
Review Checklist for DFT Whiteboard Framework focuses on interview answer structure quality, mechanism clarity, tradeoff articulation. The goal is to convert metric movement into mechanism, owner, and release decision.
Run tags and scenario context are explicit.
Constraints and legality assumptions are documented.
Quality, timing, and test-power checks are included.
Diagnosis evidence supports residual-risk decision.
Owners signed: candidate, DFT interviewer, hiring panel.
Signoff ownership
OWNERSHIP MAP - DFT Whiteboard Framework
artifact owner
---------------- -----------------
architecture/report candidate
constraints/setup DFT interviewer
physical/test hiring panel
Name an owner for each failing metric cluster.DFT deep dive
Senior DFT interviews test tradeoff judgment under imperfect data.
Concept diagram
INTERVIEW ANSWER LOOP
state metric -> explain mechanism -> request evidence -> propose fix -> list regressionMetric graph
ANSWER QUALITY
mechanism clarity + ownership clarity + regression disciplineReports and artifacts
whiteboard rubric
scenario scorecard
trap checklist
follow-up depth index
Mini case study
Candidate improved from tool-only answers to mechanism-first narratives by using metric->artifact->decision template.
Debug branches
Always state assumptions
Name cross-team owners
Discuss risk and fallback plan
Senior review question
Ask: what evidence proves this DFT decision is safe for production?
Key takeaways
State metric, lot/corner context, and pattern tag with every claim.
Treat timing, power, and quality as one signoff problem.
Common pitfalls
Chasing coverage without legality checks.
Ignoring test-power side effects of pattern changes.
Debugging silicon without reproducible tags.
Principal DFT review addendum
Strong DFT interviews follow a repeatable chain: architecture intent, controllability/observability, constraints, quality metrics, and debug loop.
Metric: interview answer structure quality, mechanism clarity, tradeoff articulation