STA Mastery · All levels
Path Group Prioritization
Delay Graph & Path Analysis: Path groups classify timing intent so optimization and debug focus on the paths that matter for signoff and product modes.
What this topic teaches
Path Group Prioritization is about converting constraints and path rules into measurable slack. Path groups classify timing intent so optimization and debug focus on the paths that matter for signoff and product modes. The hard part is never the textbook inequality; it is proving, under the right corner/mode/view, which layer — constraint, view, or implementation — broke the contract.
The senior-engineer question
When WNS by path group, reg2reg vs in2reg vs reg2out slack moves, can you identify the failing path group, the STA layer, the responsible owner, and the smallest experiment that proves the root cause?
STA CLOSURE FLOW — Path Group Prioritization
constraints (SDC)
|
v
timing graph (cell + net delays)
|
v
MMMC scenarios (corner x mode x view)
|
v
variation + SI adjustments
|
v
slack (WNS/TNS) -> ECO -> regression
Debug rule: always state corner, mode, view, and database tag with slack.Picture the timing closure flow
Start every study session by drawing the behavior before reading signals. The diagrams below are the mental models to reproduce on a whiteboard.
Path group map
PATH GROUPS
reg2reg : FF -> logic -> FF (core closure)
in2reg : input -> FF (interface)
reg2out : FF -> output (interface)
reg2cg : FF -> clock gate (special hold risk)
Optimize and report WNS per group — not global average only.Timing path sequence
TIMING PATH — Path Group Prioritization
launch FF --logic stages--> capture FF
| |
launch clock capture clock
| |
required: arrival < capture_edge - setup
metric: WNS by path group, reg2reg vs in2reg vs reg2out slackWho owns which layer
STA OWNERSHIP LAYERS — Path Group Prioritization
layer owns failure mode
---------------- -------------------------- ---------------------
constraints clocks, IO, exceptions false violations
implementation cells, nets, placement real path delay
extraction SPEF/RC corners view mismatch
signoff policy derate, MMMC matrix margin disputes
closure ECO order, regression fix breaks other cornerEvidence to collect
Primary metric: WNS by path group, reg2reg vs in2reg vs reg2out slack.
Primary artifact: path group summary, group_policy SDC, endpoint classification report.
Owners to bring into review: STA lead, synthesis owner, PD owner.
Spec clause or requirement ID for every constraint claim.
One failing report_timing excerpt and one reduced path that isolates the rule.
Ownership map
OWNERSHIP MAP — Path Group Prioritization
artifact owner
---------------- -----------------
timing report STA lead
SDC/constraint synthesis owner
implementation PD owner
Every WNS cluster needs a named owner before ECO.Subpages in this topic
Each topic is taught across mechanism, inputs/outputs, reports, debug, worked example, pitfalls, interview, checklist, theory, design space, expanded case study, walkthrough, comparison matrix, software view, and silicon PPA impact.
Key takeaways
State corner, mode, and view with every slack number.
Separate constraint bugs, view mismatches, and real path delays before ECO.
Run setup and hold plus full MMMC after every change.
Common pitfalls
Comparing runs with different SPEF or SDC tags.
Broad false_path to hide violations.
Setup-only ECO without hold regression.
STA deep dive
Slack is a path story — read the graph, not just the number.
Concept diagram
TIMING GRAPH
FF --cell-- logic --net-- logic --cell-- FF
launch captureMetric graph
SLACK TAIL
paths | ***
| *******
|********* <- fix WNS firstReports and artifacts
WNS/TNS
path slack histogram
cell vs net %
path group summary
Mini case study
WNS -90ps but 80% net delay on one congested route — PD route fix beat upsizing three cells.
Debug branches
Cell-heavy -> sizing/VT
Net-heavy -> route/layer
Check launch/capture clocks
Senior review question
Ask: what corner/mode/view proves this topic is closed or failing?
Key takeaways
State corner, mode, view, and database tag with every slack claim.
Run setup and hold plus MMMC regression after every ECO.
Common pitfalls
Comparing STA runs with different SPEF or SDC tags.
Broad false_path to green-wash violations.
Setup-only ECO without hold check.