Path Group Prioritization: Debug Playbook

Debug playbook

Debug Playbook for Path Group Prioritization focuses on WNS by path group, reg2reg vs in2reg vs reg2out slack. The goal is to connect the observable symptom to timing mechanism, ownership, and regression risk.

STA debug is a search for the FIRST deviation, not the loudest downstream symptom. Hold failures after setup ECO are a classic example of fixing the wrong layer first.

Root-cause tree

ROOT-CAUSE TREE — Path Group Prioritization

WNS by path group, reg2reg vs in2reg vs reg2out slack looks wrong
        |
   same netlist tag?
     /        \
   no          yes
   |            |
 view/SDC     real path or
 mismatch     constraint bug
 /    \           |
lib   SPEF    delay breakdown
diff  diff    cell vs net

1. Freeze the failing netlist tag, SDC revision, and SPEF corner.

2. Find the first constraint or delay anomaly on the critical path.

3. Map the path to launch/capture clocks and path group.

4. Classify the failure: constraint bug, view mismatch, cell delay, net delay, or SI.

5. Prove the mechanism with one reduced path or isolated scenario.

6. Patch the smallest owner-controlled fix and rerun setup, hold, and MMMC.

Review memo template

STAFF STA REVIEW MEMO — Delay Graph & Path Analysis / Path Group Prioritization

1. Symptom
   - Watched metric: WNS by path group, reg2reg vs in2reg vs reg2out slack
   - Failing scenario: <corner/mode/view>
   - Path group: <reg2reg / in2reg / reg2out / async>
   - Database tags: <netlist, SDC, SPEF, lib>

2. Mechanism hypothesis
   - Primary mechanism: Path groups classify timing intent so optimization and debug focus on the paths that matter for signoff and product modes.
   - Competing hypothesis: <constraint bug, view mismatch, cell delay, net delay, SI>
   - Missing evidence: <report_timing, clock report, constraint trace>

3. Proposed action
   - Minimal reversible change: <SDC fix, sizing, VT swap, route, useful skew>
   - Expected metric movement: <WNS/TNS delta>
   - Regression risk: hold, other corners, SI, leakage

4. Signoff
   - Re-run artifact: path group summary, group_policy SDC, endpoint classification report
   - Required owners: STA lead, synthesis owner, PD owner
   - Final decision: ECO, waive, constraint fix, or escalate

STA deep dive

Slack is a path story — read the graph, not just the number.

Concept diagram

TIMING GRAPH

FF --cell-- logic --net-- logic --cell-- FF
launch                              capture

Metric graph

SLACK TAIL

paths |    ***
      |  *******
      |*********  <- fix WNS first

Reports and artifacts

• WNS/TNS

• path slack histogram

• cell vs net %

• path group summary

Mini case study

WNS -90ps but 80% net delay on one congested route — PD route fix beat upsizing three cells.

Debug branches

• Cell-heavy -> sizing/VT

• Net-heavy -> route/layer

• Check launch/capture clocks

Senior review question

Ask: what corner/mode/view proves this topic is closed or failing?

Key takeaways

• State corner, mode, view, and database tag with every slack claim.

• Run setup and hold plus MMMC regression after every ECO.

Common pitfalls

• Comparing STA runs with different SPEF or SDC tags.

• Broad false_path to green-wash violations.

• Setup-only ECO without hold check.

Principal STA review addendum

Path groups classify timing intent so optimization and debug focus on the paths that matter for signoff and product modes.

Metric: WNS by path group, reg2reg vs in2reg vs reg2out slack