STA Mastery · All levels

Path Group War Room: Comparison Matrix

Comparison Matrix for Path Group War Room.

Comparison matrix

Debug order prevents expensive wrong-owner ECO.

diagram
+------------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| Approach         | Strength       | Weakness       | Best when      |
+------------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| Conservative     | safe           | slow closure   | risk-averse    |
| Balanced         | practical      | needs discipline | production     |
| Aggressive       | fast           | regression risk | tapeout crunch |
| RTL change       | structural     | long loop      | architectural  |
+------------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+

When to choose each approach

  • Match approach to schedule and silicon risk

Interview traps

  • One-size ECO playbook

  • Ignoring hold

Evidence comparison

diagram
STA EVIDENCE MATRIX — Path Group War Room

+-------------------+------------------------+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| Evidence           | Tells you              | Does not prove           | Next action             |
+-------------------+------------------------+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| report_timing      | critical path slack    | root cause class         | cell vs net split       |
| clock report       | clock reachability     | path delay               | fix generated_clock     |
| SDC diff           | constraint change      | physical delay           | re-run all scenarios    |
| SPEF tag compare   | parasitic view         | constraint quality       | isolate view mismatch   |
| MMMC dashboard     | worst scenario         | single-path fix          | assign path group owner |
+-------------------+------------------------+--------------------------+-------------------------+

STA deep dive

Debug hygiene separates senior STA leads from report readers.

Concept diagram

diagram
DEBUG ORDER

1. same tags?  2. constraints?  3. view?  4. real path?  5. ECO

Metric graph

diagram
ROOT CAUSE MIX (typical)

constraint bugs  ████████  35%
view mismatch    ██████    25%
real path        ██████    25%
methodology      ████      15%

Reports and artifacts

  • run manifest

  • SDC diff

  • SPEF tag

  • scenario isolation

Mini case study

Mystery regression: SPEF corner tag typo in run script — not a design bug.

Debug branches

  • Manifest every run

  • War room by path group

Senior review question

Ask: what corner/mode/view proves this topic is closed or failing?

Key takeaways

  • State corner, mode, view, and database tag with every slack claim.

  • Run setup and hold plus MMMC regression after every ECO.

Common pitfalls

  • Comparing STA runs with different SPEF or SDC tags.

  • Broad false_path to green-wash violations.

  • Setup-only ECO without hold check.

Principal STA review addendum

War rooms assign failing path groups to owning teams (RTL, synth, PD, CTS) based on delay breakdown and path class.

Metric: WNS per path group, endpoint owner assignment rate