CDC / RDC · All levels
Synchronizer Selection Guide: Expanded Case Study
Expanded Case Study for Synchronizer Selection Guide.
Extended case study
Milestone review flags crossing class coverage, incorrect pattern usage rate, waiver count around Synchronizer Selection Guide.
Background
Team believed crossings were stable until stress mode exposed intermittent anomalies.
Symptoms observed
crossing class coverage, incorrect pattern usage rate, waiver count regression
Mismatch between structural report and dynamic behavior
Waiver debate under schedule pressure
Investigation timeline
Freeze design, reset, and tool configuration tags.
Reproduce failing scenario with minimized stimulus.
Map path/protocol/reset dependencies.
Classify root cause and containment options.
Execute minimal safe fix.
Run stress regression and review board.
Root cause
Root cause links to Synchronizer Selection Guide: Crossing intent (level, pulse, bus, control/data coupling) determines legal synchronization topology and verification evidence.
Fix and validation
Targeted RTL/protocol/reset correction
Evidence refresh
Signoff board decision
Lessons learned
Treat waivers as temporary risk contracts
Track owner and expiry
Regression before closure
CASE STUDY — Synchronizer Selection Guide
critical issues before / after / signoffCrossing sequence under stress
CROSSING FLOW — Synchronizer Selection Guide
source clock domain -> launch signal -> crossing structure -> destination sample
| | | |
source FF protocol sync / fifo destination FF
Key metric: crossing class coverage, incorrect pattern usage rate, waiver countCDC/RDC deep dive
Metastability is managed risk, not eliminated risk.
Concept diagram
METASTABILITY FLOW
async event -> first sample may metastabilize
-> settle window
-> downstream sample confidenceMetric graph
MTBF TREND
target MTBF ---------
current design ____/Reports and artifacts
MTBF assumptions
synchronizer inventory
crossing class summary
critical waivers
Mini case study
Pulse sync chosen for a level signal caused intermittent stuck state under voltage stress.
Debug branches
Validate crossing class first
Check pulse width assumptions
Audit synchronizer template usage
Senior review question
Ask: what evidence proves this risk is closed for silicon, not just tool-clean?
Key takeaways
State crossing class, assumptions, and owner with every issue.
Run structural and dynamic regressions after each fix.
Common pitfalls
Treating all warnings as equivalent risk.
Waiving issues without containment evidence.
Skipping reset and reconvergence stress after CDC fixes.
Principal CDC/RDC review addendum
Crossing intent (level, pulse, bus, control/data coupling) determines legal synchronization topology and verification evidence.
Metric: crossing class coverage, incorrect pattern usage rate, waiver count