CDC / RDC · All levels
Synchronizer Selection Guide: Review Checklist
Review Checklist for Synchronizer Selection Guide.
Review checklist
Review Checklist for Synchronizer Selection Guide focuses on crossing class coverage, incorrect pattern usage rate, waiver count. The goal is to convert issue observations into mechanism-backed closure decisions.
Crossing and reset intent are explicitly classified.
Protocol assumptions are documented and checked.
Critical issues have owners and dates.
Waivers include mechanism, containment, and expiry.
Regression matrix includes stress and milestone modes.
Owners signed: CDC lead, methodology owner, design lead.
Signoff ownership
OWNERSHIP MAP — Synchronizer Selection Guide
artifact owner
---------------------- -------------------------
design intent CDC lead
verification evidence methodology owner
signoff decision design lead
Every open CDC/RDC issue needs one accountable owner before waiver or fix.CDC/RDC deep dive
Metastability is managed risk, not eliminated risk.
Concept diagram
METASTABILITY FLOW
async event -> first sample may metastabilize
-> settle window
-> downstream sample confidenceMetric graph
MTBF TREND
target MTBF ---------
current design ____/Reports and artifacts
MTBF assumptions
synchronizer inventory
crossing class summary
critical waivers
Mini case study
Pulse sync chosen for a level signal caused intermittent stuck state under voltage stress.
Debug branches
Validate crossing class first
Check pulse width assumptions
Audit synchronizer template usage
Senior review question
Ask: what evidence proves this risk is closed for silicon, not just tool-clean?
Key takeaways
State crossing class, assumptions, and owner with every issue.
Run structural and dynamic regressions after each fix.
Common pitfalls
Treating all warnings as equivalent risk.
Waiving issues without containment evidence.
Skipping reset and reconvergence stress after CDC fixes.
Principal CDC/RDC review addendum
Crossing intent (level, pulse, bus, control/data coupling) determines legal synchronization topology and verification evidence.
Metric: crossing class coverage, incorrect pattern usage rate, waiver count