DFT / ATPG · All levels

Package Test Interface: Review Checklist

Review Checklist for Package Test Interface.

Review checklist

Review Checklist for Package Test Interface focuses on pin mux correctness, package test mode coverage, board bring-up escape count. The goal is to convert metric movement into mechanism, owner, and release decision.

  • Run tags and scenario context are explicit.

  • Constraints and legality assumptions are documented.

  • Quality, timing, and test-power checks are included.

  • Diagnosis evidence supports residual-risk decision.

  • Owners signed: package owner, board owner, DFT lead.

Signoff ownership

diagram
OWNERSHIP MAP - Package Test Interface

artifact              owner
----------------      -----------------
architecture/report package owner
constraints/setup   board owner
physical/test       DFT lead

Name an owner for each failing metric cluster.

DFT deep dive

Boundary scan and JTAG are board-level contracts, not just RTL features.

Concept diagram

diagram
JTAG ACCESS

TAP controller -> instruction register -> boundary/data register -> board test/debug

Metric graph

diagram
BOARD TEST READINESS

instruction coverage vs pin controllability

Reports and artifacts

  • TAP compliance report

  • boundary cell coverage matrix

  • EXTEST/INTEST results

  • debug lock policy log

Mini case study

Board bring-up blocked by pinmux override in one mode; TAP instruction decode and package table alignment fixed path.

Debug branches

  • Verify TAP state transitions

  • Audit package pin ownership

  • Check security lifecycle lock behavior

Senior review question

Ask: what evidence proves this DFT decision is safe for production?

Key takeaways

  • State metric, lot/corner context, and pattern tag with every claim.

  • Treat timing, power, and quality as one signoff problem.

Common pitfalls

  • Chasing coverage without legality checks.

  • Ignoring test-power side effects of pattern changes.

  • Debugging silicon without reproducible tags.

Principal DFT review addendum

Package and board interfaces determine whether intended boundary and test modes can be exercised without conflicting with functional muxing.

Metric: pin mux correctness, package test mode coverage, board bring-up escape count