STA Mastery · All levels
ECO Physical vs Logical: Review Checklist
Review Checklist for ECO Physical vs Logical.
Review checklist
Review Checklist for ECO Physical vs Logical focuses on ECO turnaround time, leakage delta, area delta, timing recovery. The goal is to connect the observable symptom to timing mechanism, ownership, and regression risk.
SDC revision and implemented clock/exception policy are named.
Clock/reset and CDC assumptions are reviewed.
Path groups, IO delays, and exception rationale are documented.
MMMC scenario list maps back to signoff requirements.
WNS/TNS artifact stored with corner/mode/view tags.
Owners signed: PD owner, RTL owner, STA owner.
Sign-off ownership
OWNERSHIP MAP — ECO Physical vs Logical
artifact owner
---------------- -----------------
timing report PD owner
SDC/constraint RTL owner
implementation STA owner
Every WNS cluster needs a named owner before ECO.STA deep dive
ECO without regression is a coin flip.
Concept diagram
ECO LOOP
failing path -> fix -> setup check -> hold check -> SI -> MMMC matrixMetric graph
ECO PROGRESS
WNS
0 | o target
-50| o
-100| o baseline
+-----------------> ECO #Reports and artifacts
pre/post WNS
hold delta
leakage delta
ECO ticket log
Mini case study
48-hour tapeout crunch: VT swap fixed setup; hold fixed with route on short path — order mattered.
Debug branches
Never ship setup-only proof
Logical ECO needs equivalence
Senior review question
Ask: what corner/mode/view proves this topic is closed or failing?
Key takeaways
State corner, mode, view, and database tag with every slack claim.
Run setup and hold plus MMMC regression after every ECO.
Common pitfalls
Comparing STA runs with different SPEF or SDC tags.
Broad false_path to green-wash violations.
Setup-only ECO without hold check.
Principal STA review addendum
Logical ECO changes netlist; physical ECO changes placement/routing; each has different cost, risk, and regression surface.
Metric: ECO turnaround time, leakage delta, area delta, timing recovery