Some findings are not about missing circuits but about time: the structure is correct, yet analysis shows a domain can start operating before a domain it depends on is ready. A producer released before its consumer, a sender before its receiver's ready flag, or a user of a memory before the controller has left reset.
These findings read differently from structural ones. There is no gate to add; the fix is a sequencing change, a ready flag, or a documented guarantee that the early traffic is harmless (for example, the consumer ignores everything until its own enable, and that ignore path is itself verified).
Identify the two domains and the dependency direction: who must be ready before whom, and what flows between them.
Check the sequencer or the ready flags: is there any mechanism at all, or did both domains simply release on their own clocks?
If a mechanism exists, check it covers this pair: a global sequencer with the wrong order for this interface, or a ready flag the sender never waits on, still fails.
Clear it by fixing the order (sequencer), adding the handshake (ready flag), or proving harmlessness with a test that releases in the worst order and checks the traffic.
Sequencing: nothing orders the two releases or makes the producer wait for the consumer's readiness. Synchronisers align each release to its clock; they do not order the pair.
A test that releases the domains in the worst order the design permits and checks the traffic is complete and unduplicated. Passing only in the nominal order proves nothing about the finding.