Review Checklist for Scenario: Coverage Storm focuses on coverage shortfall under schedule pressure, pattern growth slope. The goal is to convert metric movement into mechanism, owner, and release decision.
Run tags and scenario context are explicit.
Constraints and legality assumptions are documented.
Quality, timing, and test-power checks are included.
Diagnosis evidence supports residual-risk decision.
Owners signed: ATPG owner, DFT lead, product quality owner.
OWNERSHIP MAP - Scenario: Coverage Storm
artifact owner
---------------- -----------------
architecture/report ATPG owner
constraints/setup DFT lead
physical/test product quality owner
Name an owner for each failing metric cluster.Senior DFT interviews test tradeoff judgment under imperfect data.
INTERVIEW ANSWER LOOP
state metric -> explain mechanism -> request evidence -> propose fix -> list regressionANSWER QUALITY
mechanism clarity + ownership clarity + regression disciplinewhiteboard rubric
scenario scorecard
trap checklist
follow-up depth index
Candidate improved from tool-only answers to mechanism-first narratives by using metric->artifact->decision template.
Always state assumptions
Name cross-team owners
Discuss risk and fallback plan
Ask: what evidence proves this DFT decision is safe for production?
State metric, lot/corner context, and pattern tag with every claim.
Treat timing, power, and quality as one signoff problem.
Chasing coverage without legality checks.
Ignoring test-power side effects of pattern changes.
Debugging silicon without reproducible tags.
Coverage crises require separating true untestable faults from constraint/model issues and choosing the smallest high-impact closure plan.
Metric: coverage shortfall under schedule pressure, pattern growth slope
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown