Chain balance and test clocks directly affect tester throughput and escape risk.
compression logic footprint
hold buffers from scan paths
shift toggling peaks
capture burst stress
test-clock skew
shift/capture path sensitivity
chain route detours
placement hotspots near test logic
pattern replay correlation
diagnosis reproducibility
SILICON IMPACT - Scan-Ready RTL
area/power/timing/yield tradeoffSignoff needs silicon evidence
Ownership clarity accelerates closure
CHAIN BALANCE - Scan-Ready RTL
chain length
^
| o o
| o o o
| o
+-----------------------------> chain index
Tight spread reduces shift time and hold-fix burden.Scan architecture quality determines whether ATPG can control and observe real silicon state.
SCAN INSERTION FLOW
scan-ready RTL -> scan replacement -> stitch chains -> DRC -> ATPG handoffCHAIN BALANCE
chain length spread
low spread = better shift time
high spread = routing + hold riskscan insertion summary
chain balance report
scan DRC log
clocking legality report
Coverage plateau traced to non-scan flops in reset islands; RTL + DFT lint policy fixed root cause.
Check scan replacement first
Audit chain legality by domain
Validate shift/capture clocks
Ask: what evidence proves this DFT decision is safe for production?
State metric, lot/corner context, and pattern tag with every claim.
Treat timing, power, and quality as one signoff problem.
Chasing coverage without legality checks.
Ignoring test-power side effects of pattern changes.
Debugging silicon without reproducible tags.
RTL coding style controls scanability through reset style, clock gating discipline, and avoiding structures that block controllability/observability.
Metric: DFT lint pass rate, uncontrollable register count, black-box scan escapes
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown