Review checklist

Review Checklist for ECO Regression Matrix focuses on corners re-run, new violations introduced, signoff delta. The goal is to connect the observable symptom to timing mechanism, ownership, and regression risk.

• SDC revision and implemented clock/exception policy are named.

• Clock/reset and CDC assumptions are reviewed.

• Path groups, IO delays, and exception rationale are documented.

• MMMC scenario list maps back to signoff requirements.

• WNS/TNS artifact stored with corner/mode/view tags.

• Owners signed: STA lead, CAD owner, program lead.

Sign-off ownership

OWNERSHIP MAP — ECO Regression Matrix

artifact              owner
----------------      -----------------
timing report       STA lead
SDC/constraint      CAD owner
implementation      program lead

Every WNS cluster needs a named owner before ECO.

STA deep dive

ECO without regression is a coin flip.

Concept diagram

ECO LOOP

failing path -> fix -> setup check -> hold check -> SI -> MMMC matrix

Metric graph

ECO PROGRESS

WNS
 0 |              o target
-50|        o
-100|   o baseline
    +-----------------> ECO #

Reports and artifacts

• pre/post WNS

• hold delta

• leakage delta

• ECO ticket log

Mini case study

48-hour tapeout crunch: VT swap fixed setup; hold fixed with route on short path — order mattered.

Debug branches

• Never ship setup-only proof

• Logical ECO needs equivalence

Senior review question

Ask: what corner/mode/view proves this topic is closed or failing?

Key takeaways

• State corner, mode, view, and database tag with every slack claim.

• Run setup and hold plus MMMC regression after every ECO.

Common pitfalls

• Comparing STA runs with different SPEF or SDC tags.

• Broad false_path to green-wash violations.

• Setup-only ECO without hold check.

Principal STA review addendum

Every ECO must re-run the agreed MMMC matrix plus SI; regression hygiene prevents shipping a fix that breaks another corner.

Metric: corners re-run, new violations introduced, signoff delta