DFT / ATPG · All levels
Compression Architectures: Inputs & Outputs
Inputs & Outputs for Compression Architectures.
Inputs and outputs contract
Inputs & Outputs for Compression Architectures focuses on compression ratio, decompressor channel utilization, aliasing risk. The goal is to convert metric movement into mechanism, owner, and release decision.
Treat these as a release contract. Ambiguity here creates expensive debug loops because teams optimize against different assumptions.
INPUTS
- scan/ATPG architecture and constraints
- fault model and quality target policy
- pattern generation config + tester limits
- timing/power/physical assumptions
OUTPUTS
- quality metrics and closure status
- signed artifacts and owner approvals
- diagnosis evidence for residual risk
- release, waiver, or escalation decisionFlow sequence
DFT FLOW - Compression Architectures
scan insertion -> chain stitch -> compression map -> ATPG -> tester apply -> diagnosis
| | | | |
controllability shift balance channel use coverage silicon correlation
Primary metric: compression ratio, decompressor channel utilization, aliasing riskOwnership map
OWNERSHIP MAP - Compression Architectures
artifact owner
---------------- -----------------
architecture/report DFT architect
constraints/setup ATPG owner
physical/test test engineering owner
Name an owner for each failing metric cluster.DFT deep dive
Compression saves tester time only when diagnosis observability remains credible.
Concept diagram
COMPRESSION LOOP
EDT/decompressor -> compressed patterns -> compactor responses -> diagnosisMetric graph
PATTERN vs COVERAGE
coverage up -> pattern count up
compression up -> pattern count down (until aliasing risk)Reports and artifacts
compression ratio dashboard
pattern count trend
X-source report
diagnosis bucket summary
Mini case study
Compactor overflow plus unknown inflation caused false diagnosis; masking policy and channel map corrected.
Debug branches
Separate X issues from silicon defects
Replay failing patterns uncompressed
Track tester memory budget
Senior review question
Ask: what evidence proves this DFT decision is safe for production?
Key takeaways
State metric, lot/corner context, and pattern tag with every claim.
Treat timing, power, and quality as one signoff problem.
Common pitfalls
Chasing coverage without legality checks.
Ignoring test-power side effects of pattern changes.
Debugging silicon without reproducible tags.
Principal DFT review addendum
Compression inserts on-chip decompressors/compactors to reduce external tester pattern volume while preserving defect detection quality.
Metric: compression ratio, decompressor channel utilization, aliasing risk