Compressed signatures are only useful when X behavior is controlled.
compression logic footprint
hold buffers from scan paths
shift toggling peaks
capture burst stress
test-clock skew
shift/capture path sensitivity
chain route detours
placement hotspots near test logic
pattern replay correlation
diagnosis reproducibility
SILICON IMPACT - Compression Architectures
area/power/timing/yield tradeoffSignoff needs silicon evidence
Ownership clarity accelerates closure
CHAIN BALANCE - Compression Architectures
chain length
^
| o o
| o o o
| o
+-----------------------------> chain index
Tight spread reduces shift time and hold-fix burden.Compression saves tester time only when diagnosis observability remains credible.
COMPRESSION LOOP
EDT/decompressor -> compressed patterns -> compactor responses -> diagnosisPATTERN vs COVERAGE
coverage up -> pattern count up
compression up -> pattern count down (until aliasing risk)compression ratio dashboard
pattern count trend
X-source report
diagnosis bucket summary
Compactor overflow plus unknown inflation caused false diagnosis; masking policy and channel map corrected.
Separate X issues from silicon defects
Replay failing patterns uncompressed
Track tester memory budget
Ask: what evidence proves this DFT decision is safe for production?
State metric, lot/corner context, and pattern tag with every claim.
Treat timing, power, and quality as one signoff problem.
Chasing coverage without legality checks.
Ignoring test-power side effects of pattern changes.
Debugging silicon without reproducible tags.
Compression inserts on-chip decompressors/compactors to reduce external tester pattern volume while preserving defect detection quality.
Metric: compression ratio, decompressor channel utilization, aliasing risk
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown