Mechanism for Compression Debug focuses on unknown/X inflation, compactor overflow incidents, pattern replay success rate. The goal is to convert metric movement into mechanism, owner, and release decision.
Compression debug isolates whether failures come from EDT wiring, X-masking policy, clocking, or ATPG assumptions before blaming silicon defects. Think of DFT as a quality pipeline where setup quality determines what silicon evidence means.
Identify where controllability/observability is introduced.
Identify legal constraints and mode assumptions.
Identify failure class: architecture, constraints, physical, or silicon.
DFT CLOSURE FLOW - Compression Debug
scan/test architecture
|
v
ATPG constraints + fault models
|
v
pattern generation + compression
|
v
timing/power/physical validation
|
v
silicon diagnosis and release signoff
Debug rule: always state metric, run tags, and owning team with any claim.compression architecture -> ATPG patterns -> fail logs -> diagnosis -> yield learningDFT OWNERSHIP LAYERS - Compression Debug
layer owns failure mode
---------------- -------------------------- -------------------------
rtl/architecture scanability hooks uncontrollable logic
atpg/constraints legal pattern intent aborts, low coverage
physical/clocking chain route + test clocks shift hold/timing escapes
tester/program pattern apply integrity false binning / bad fails
quality signoff release criteria escapes or schedule slipCompression saves tester time only when diagnosis observability remains credible.
COMPRESSION LOOP
EDT/decompressor -> compressed patterns -> compactor responses -> diagnosisPATTERN vs COVERAGE
coverage up -> pattern count up
compression up -> pattern count down (until aliasing risk)compression ratio dashboard
pattern count trend
X-source report
diagnosis bucket summary
Compactor overflow plus unknown inflation caused false diagnosis; masking policy and channel map corrected.
Separate X issues from silicon defects
Replay failing patterns uncompressed
Track tester memory budget
Ask: what evidence proves this DFT decision is safe for production?
State metric, lot/corner context, and pattern tag with every claim.
Treat timing, power, and quality as one signoff problem.
Chasing coverage without legality checks.
Ignoring test-power side effects of pattern changes.
Debugging silicon without reproducible tags.
Compression debug isolates whether failures come from EDT wiring, X-masking policy, clocking, or ATPG assumptions before blaming silicon defects.
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown