DFT / ATPG · All levels

Physical DFT Debug: Inputs & Outputs

Inputs & Outputs for Physical DFT Debug.

Inputs and outputs contract

Inputs & Outputs for Physical DFT Debug focuses on physical root-cause turnaround, repeat DFT route violations, signoff escape risk. The goal is to convert metric movement into mechanism, owner, and release decision.

Treat these as a release contract. Ambiguity here creates expensive debug loops because teams optimize against different assumptions.

diagram
INPUTS
  - scan/ATPG architecture and constraints
  - fault model and quality target policy
  - pattern generation config + tester limits
  - timing/power/physical assumptions

OUTPUTS
  - quality metrics and closure status
  - signed artifacts and owner approvals
  - diagnosis evidence for residual risk
  - release, waiver, or escalation decision

Flow sequence

diagram
DFT FLOW - Physical DFT Debug

scan insertion -> chain stitch -> compression map -> ATPG -> tester apply -> diagnosis
      |                |                |            |             |
 controllability   shift balance    channel use   coverage     silicon correlation

Primary metric: physical root-cause turnaround, repeat DFT route violations, signoff escape risk

Ownership map

diagram
OWNERSHIP MAP - Physical DFT Debug

artifact              owner
----------------      -----------------
architecture/report PD owner
constraints/setup   STA owner
physical/test       DFT owner

Name an owner for each failing metric cluster.

DFT deep dive

Physical integration quality decides whether DFT architecture survives implementation realities.

Concept diagram

diagram
PHYSICAL DFT FLOW

chain planning -> floorplan placement -> route -> test timing/power validation

Metric graph

diagram
ROUTING BURDEN

poor chain order -> longer routes -> more hold buffers

Reports and artifacts

  • scan physical wirelength

  • congestion heatmap

  • test clock skew

  • handoff issue tracker

Mini case study

Late scan reorder reduced route detours and eliminated a major shift hold cluster before signoff.

Debug branches

  • Correlate chain order with congestion

  • Place compression logic near chain clusters

  • Keep DFT-PD handoff versioned

Senior review question

Ask: what evidence proves this DFT decision is safe for production?

Key takeaways

  • State metric, lot/corner context, and pattern tag with every claim.

  • Treat timing, power, and quality as one signoff problem.

Common pitfalls

  • Chasing coverage without legality checks.

  • Ignoring test-power side effects of pattern changes.

  • Debugging silicon without reproducible tags.

Principal DFT review addendum

Physical DFT debug traces violations to chain ordering, buffering strategy, clock topology, or extraction/view mismatches.

Metric: physical root-cause turnaround, repeat DFT route violations, signoff escape risk