DFT / ATPG · All levels
Physical DFT Debug: Inputs & Outputs
Inputs & Outputs for Physical DFT Debug.
Inputs and outputs contract
Inputs & Outputs for Physical DFT Debug focuses on physical root-cause turnaround, repeat DFT route violations, signoff escape risk. The goal is to convert metric movement into mechanism, owner, and release decision.
Treat these as a release contract. Ambiguity here creates expensive debug loops because teams optimize against different assumptions.
INPUTS
- scan/ATPG architecture and constraints
- fault model and quality target policy
- pattern generation config + tester limits
- timing/power/physical assumptions
OUTPUTS
- quality metrics and closure status
- signed artifacts and owner approvals
- diagnosis evidence for residual risk
- release, waiver, or escalation decisionFlow sequence
DFT FLOW - Physical DFT Debug
scan insertion -> chain stitch -> compression map -> ATPG -> tester apply -> diagnosis
| | | | |
controllability shift balance channel use coverage silicon correlation
Primary metric: physical root-cause turnaround, repeat DFT route violations, signoff escape riskOwnership map
OWNERSHIP MAP - Physical DFT Debug
artifact owner
---------------- -----------------
architecture/report PD owner
constraints/setup STA owner
physical/test DFT owner
Name an owner for each failing metric cluster.DFT deep dive
Physical integration quality decides whether DFT architecture survives implementation realities.
Concept diagram
PHYSICAL DFT FLOW
chain planning -> floorplan placement -> route -> test timing/power validationMetric graph
ROUTING BURDEN
poor chain order -> longer routes -> more hold buffersReports and artifacts
scan physical wirelength
congestion heatmap
test clock skew
handoff issue tracker
Mini case study
Late scan reorder reduced route detours and eliminated a major shift hold cluster before signoff.
Debug branches
Correlate chain order with congestion
Place compression logic near chain clusters
Keep DFT-PD handoff versioned
Senior review question
Ask: what evidence proves this DFT decision is safe for production?
Key takeaways
State metric, lot/corner context, and pattern tag with every claim.
Treat timing, power, and quality as one signoff problem.
Common pitfalls
Chasing coverage without legality checks.
Ignoring test-power side effects of pattern changes.
Debugging silicon without reproducible tags.
Principal DFT review addendum
Physical DFT debug traces violations to chain ordering, buffering strategy, clock topology, or extraction/view mismatches.
Metric: physical root-cause turnaround, repeat DFT route violations, signoff escape risk