DFT / ATPG · All levels
Test-Mode SDC: Expanded Case Study
Expanded Case Study for Test-Mode SDC.
Extended case study
Release review: test SDC completeness, false test-path violations, test constraint audit score regresses after a test-flow update touching Test-Mode SDC.
Background
Team had prior signoff, then a new program/config introduced regressions in selected buckets.
Symptoms observed
test SDC completeness, false test-path violations, test constraint audit score regression
Mismatch between simulation and tester
Escalation without clear owner
Investigation timeline
Hour 0: freeze pattern set, constraints, and tester program tags
Hour 1: isolate first failing bucket by mode/lot
Hour 2: verify legality and constraints assumptions
Hour 3: correlate with physical/timing/power context
Hour 4: choose minimal reversible fix
Hour 5: run full signoff regression matrix
Hour 6: publish decision memo and owners
Root cause
Root cause tied to Test-Mode SDC: Dedicated test SDC captures scan clocks, test enables, and exceptions needed to analyze shift and capture behavior correctly.
Fix and validation
Apply bounded fix with owner
Re-run test-mode SDC, constraint audit report, test path summary
Re-validate quality, timing, and test power
Lessons learned
Tag every run artifact
Mechanism first, command second
Close with explicit release decision
CASE STUDY - Test-Mode SDC
baseline metric / regressed metric / post-fix metricSequence under stress
DFT FLOW - Test-Mode SDC
scan insertion -> chain stitch -> compression map -> ATPG -> tester apply -> diagnosis
| | | | |
controllability shift balance channel use coverage silicon correlation
Primary metric: test SDC completeness, false test-path violations, test constraint audit scoreDFT deep dive
Test signoff fails when shift/capture timing and test power are treated independently.
Concept diagram
TEST SIGNOFF LOOP
test SDC -> shift/capture timing -> power-aware ATPG -> IR validation -> releaseMetric graph
TEST CURRENT
functional current baseline
scan shift current peak-risk zoneReports and artifacts
test-mode STA report
shift/capture split
test power IR map
waiver tracker
Mini case study
At-speed patterns passed timing but failed in production due to peak shift IR; staggered capture and power-aware fill resolved.
Debug branches
Tag test and functional corners separately
Check hold in shift mode
Correlate fail bins with power hotspots
Senior review question
Ask: what evidence proves this DFT decision is safe for production?
Key takeaways
State metric, lot/corner context, and pattern tag with every claim.
Treat timing, power, and quality as one signoff problem.
Common pitfalls
Chasing coverage without legality checks.
Ignoring test-power side effects of pattern changes.
Debugging silicon without reproducible tags.
Principal DFT review addendum
Dedicated test SDC captures scan clocks, test enables, and exceptions needed to analyze shift and capture behavior correctly.
Metric: test SDC completeness, false test-path violations, test constraint audit score