Skip to content
DenseChip
Learn
PracticeCode labInterview

DenseChip

Navigate

Menu

LearnPracticeCode labInterview

Tools

All toolsSV editorCode repoResume
DenseChip

Practice, courses, and chip-design tools in one focused workspace.

LearnPracticeCode labInterviewToolsLearning paths

© 2026 DenseChip

AboutContactPrivacyTerms
Skip to lesson

Course contents

  • How to Use This Course
  • DFT Metrics Reference
  • DFT Glossary
  • Reading Path
  • Scan Fundamentals61
  • Compression & Diagnosis61
  • ATPG & Pattern Generation61
  • MBIST & LBIST61
  • Boundary Scan & JTAG61
  • Test Timing & Power61
    • Test-Mode SDC
      • Test-Mode SDC: Mechanism
      • Test-Mode SDC: Inputs & Outputs
      • Test-Mode SDC: Reports & Metrics
      • Test-Mode SDC: Debug Playbook
      • Test-Mode SDC: Worked Example
      • Test-Mode SDC: Pitfalls & Red Flags
      • Test-Mode SDC: Interview Drills
      • Test-Mode SDC: Review Checklist
      • Test-Mode SDC: Theory Deep Dive
      • Test-Mode SDC: Design Space
      • Test-Mode SDC: Expanded Case Study
      • Test-Mode SDC: Step-by-Step Walkthrough
      • Test-Mode SDC: Comparison Matrix
      • Test-Mode SDC: Software / Programmer View
      • Test-Mode SDC: Silicon PPA Impact
    • Shift vs Capture Timing
    • Test Power & IR
    • Test Signoff Reports
    • Test Timing & Power: Tricky Q&A
  • DFT Physical Integration61
  • DFT Interview Prep61
  • DFT / ATPG Cheatsheet
Loading lesson

‹Test-Mode SDC
  1. Topics
  2. Design for Test
  3. Test Timing & Power
  4. Test-Mode SDC
  5. Test-Mode SDC: Worked Example

DFT / ATPG · All levels

Test-Mode SDC: Worked Example

Worked Example for Test-Mode SDC.

On this page

    Worked example

    Worked Example for Test-Mode SDC focuses on test SDC completeness, false test-path violations, test constraint audit score. The goal is to convert metric movement into mechanism, owner, and release decision.

    A release review shows regression on test SDC completeness, false test-path violations, test constraint audit score. The strongest first move is to freeze evidence, isolate one failing bucket, and prove mechanism before changing flow knobs.

    Sequence under inspection

    Diagram
    DFT FLOW - Test-Mode SDC
    
    scan insertion -> chain stitch -> compression map -> ATPG -> tester apply -> diagnosis
          |                |                |            |             |
     controllability   shift balance    channel use   coverage     silicon correlation
    
    Primary metric: test SDC completeness, false test-path violations, test constraint audit score

    Test SDC contract

    Diagram
    test clocks + test enables + mode exceptions
        -> shift/capture timing checks
        -> legal test closure
    1. Capture failing report and exact run tags.

    2. Tag scenario (mode, lot/corner, pattern class).

    3. Trace first dependency that changed.

    4. Compare against test-mode SDC, constraint audit report, test path summary.

    5. Choose one reversible fix and predefine regression checks.

    Did the fix work?

    Diagram
    BEFORE / AFTER - Test-Mode SDC
    
    metric quality
      ^
      |                    --- release target
      |      o regressed
      |           o baseline
      |                o after fix
      +-------------------------------> closure iteration
    
    Prove quality, timing, and test-power all moved safely.

    DFT deep dive

    Test signoff fails when shift/capture timing and test power are treated independently.

    Concept diagram

    Diagram
    TEST SIGNOFF LOOP
    
    test SDC -> shift/capture timing -> power-aware ATPG -> IR validation -> release

    Metric graph

    Diagram
    TEST CURRENT
    
    functional current  baseline
    scan shift current  peak-risk zone

    Reports and artifacts

    • test-mode STA report

    • shift/capture split

    • test power IR map

    • waiver tracker

    Mini case study

    At-speed patterns passed timing but failed in production due to peak shift IR; staggered capture and power-aware fill resolved.

    Debug branches

    • Tag test and functional corners separately

    • Check hold in shift mode

    • Correlate fail bins with power hotspots

    Senior review question

    Ask: what evidence proves this DFT decision is safe for production?

    Key takeaways

    • State metric, lot/corner context, and pattern tag with every claim.

    • Treat timing, power, and quality as one signoff problem.

    Common pitfalls

    • Chasing coverage without legality checks.

    • Ignoring test-power side effects of pattern changes.

    • Debugging silicon without reproducible tags.

    Principal DFT review addendum

    Dedicated test SDC captures scan clocks, test enables, and exceptions needed to analyze shift and capture behavior correctly.

    Metric: test SDC completeness, false test-path violations, test constraint audit score

    This content block can't be displayed here.

    Block type: unknown

    This content block can't be displayed here.

    Block type: unknown

    This content block can't be displayed here.

    Block type: unknown

    Previous

    314 / 493

    Next: Test-Mode SDC: Pitfalls & Red Flags

    Up next

    Up nextTest-Mode SDC: Pitfalls & Red Flags

    Sign in to save progress

    Practice this lessonReport an error

    See also

    • Test-Mode SDC: Mechanism
    • Test-Mode SDC: Inputs & Outputs
    • Test-Mode SDC: Reports & Metrics