Review Checklist for Test Logic Floorplan focuses on compression logic placement quality, test route detours, floorplan DFT ECO count. The goal is to convert metric movement into mechanism, owner, and release decision.
Run tags and scenario context are explicit.
Constraints and legality assumptions are documented.
Quality, timing, and test-power checks are included.
Diagnosis evidence supports residual-risk decision.
Owners signed: PD owner, DFT owner, CTS owner.
OWNERSHIP MAP - Test Logic Floorplan
artifact owner
---------------- -----------------
architecture/report PD owner
constraints/setup DFT owner
physical/test CTS owner
Name an owner for each failing metric cluster.Physical integration quality decides whether DFT architecture survives implementation realities.
PHYSICAL DFT FLOW
chain planning -> floorplan placement -> route -> test timing/power validationROUTING BURDEN
poor chain order -> longer routes -> more hold buffersscan physical wirelength
congestion heatmap
test clock skew
handoff issue tracker
Late scan reorder reduced route detours and eliminated a major shift hold cluster before signoff.
Correlate chain order with congestion
Place compression logic near chain clusters
Keep DFT-PD handoff versioned
Ask: what evidence proves this DFT decision is safe for production?
State metric, lot/corner context, and pattern tag with every claim.
Treat timing, power, and quality as one signoff problem.
Chasing coverage without legality checks.
Ignoring test-power side effects of pattern changes.
Debugging silicon without reproducible tags.
Placement of decompressors, compactors, and BIST controllers impacts routing quality, clocking, and timing closure effort.
Metric: compression logic placement quality, test route detours, floorplan DFT ECO count
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown
This content block can't be displayed here.
Block type: unknown